Answer: C)quid pro quo harassment
Explanation:
This is taken from a Latin term which means "something for something" so in other words you give me something for something in return.
In this case Claudia will have to agree to sexual favours with her psychology professor so that in return the professor will give her good marks for her final exam. That is something for something in return as the term quid pro quo.
Answer:
add more points and A is the answer 2020 edg.
Explanation:
The analysis of feelings as a way to measure the tone of a conversation is the principle behind sentiment analysis.
sentiment analysis is the systematic identification, extraction, quantification, and examination of emotional states and subjective information using natural language processing, text analysis, computational linguistics, and biometrics.
Sentiment analysis, also called opinion mining, is a natural language processing (NLP) approach that identifies the emotional tone behind a body of text. It is a common way for organizations to identify and categorize opinions about products, services, or ideas.
Sentiment analysis examines subjective information in a printout: opinions, ratings, feelings, or attitudes about a topic, person, or company. Expressions can be classified as positive, negative, or neutral. Example: “I really like the new design of your website!” → Positive.
Learn more about the analysis of feeling here: brainly.com/question/4692301
#SPJ4
According to the sentence, in comparison to some other cultures, direct confrontation is considered acceptable in the United States, answer is True.
<h3>
What is direct confrontation about?</h3>
A direct confrontation referred to as a conflict between two parties wherein both the parties confront one another.
Individual can able to carry ethnic identity if they ware belong to the dominant culture.
Hence, it is most likely to be approved in United States.
Learn more about direct confrontation, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/14535139
The Supreme Court often chooses to hear many cases each year that do not involve any issues of constitutional interpretation, but which only involve interpreting federal statutes.
