It is a <u>False </u>statment to say that subsection (D) of section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act mandate that the court review the merits of every construction of a contract. The act speaks to Arbitration.
<h3>What does the Federal Arbitration Act of the United States of America say?</h3>
Subsection (D) of section 10 of the above stated Act state that the United States Court would vacate an award upon application by any of the party to the arbitration:
<em>Where the arbitrators exceeded their power or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.</em>
See the link below for more about Arbitration:
brainly.com/question/1139969
Answer:
$8750.87
Explanation:
This is compound interest problem. The formula used to solve this would be:

Where
F is the future value (what we want, after 3 years)
P is the initial value (given 6900)
r is the rate of interest per period
here, 8% per year, so 8/4 = 2% per period (since compounded per quarter)
t is the time (3 years and compounding per year so times of compounding is 3*4 = 12), so t = 12
Substituting, we get our answer:

<u>There will be about $8750.87 at the account at the end of 3 years!</u>
A time deposit or term deposit is a deposit in a financial institution with a specific maturity date or a period to maturity, commonly referred to as its “term”. Time deposits differ from at call deposits, such as savings or checking accounts, which can be withdrawn at any time, without any notice or penalty.
Answer:
resource acquisition
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the argument for diversity best demonstrated by intel's actions would be resource acquisition. This is when a company focuses on obtaining the right resources needed to accomplish the goals and needs of a project. Which in this case are talented individuals who happen to be minority workers.
Requirement 1: [Find attachment 1]
Requirement 2: [ Find attachment 2]