Answer:
C. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence
Explanation:
Spencer will win the lawsuit and Sally is liable for negligence.
This is because, Sally was the person originally hired to do the roofing job.
She hired other workers to help her with the job, so she's liable to their actions and inactions.
Sally is operating under a working agreement (contract) and has already charged a fee of $10,000 so any punitive damages would be her responsibility.
Spencer was moving around and Glen threw some roofing shingles without any word of warning to people that might be in harm's way. So for Glenn's actions, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Answer: False
Explanation:
Classification shifting is a method used whereby the core earnings are manipulated by misclassifying the items in the income statement.
One way that managers make use of classification shifting is by reporting the operating expenses for the business as nonoperating expenses. This is usually done in order to inflate the operating income.
The statement in the question is false as classification shifting by managers doesn't lead to under-reporting of total expenses and over-statement of bottom-line net income rather it lead to over reporting.
Answer and Explanation:
From the following given case or scenario, we can state that Ben in this particular case would select the best alternative during the rational decision making process. In this particular case, Ben tends to believe that he can easily cut the other expenses in order to maintain the budget for this year.
It will be weaker. According to Hering’s opponent-process model, our eyes will experience a certain level of fatigue after observing a certain object for a prolonged period of time. This level of fatigue usually happen only temporarily and you could experience the same level of color distinguish if you let your eyes rest for a while.
