Answer:
b. Invite the client into a meeting to shape the strategy.
Explanation:
It is very important when we invited the client for meeting so that we are able to share the strategy as the open and loose could be discussed in a proper way and in easy way also the suggestions are also welcome. In addition to this, the strategy should be taken place as per the preferences, requirements and choices of the clients
Therefore the option b is correct
The answer is A i just had that question on Plato
Answer:
this case tells us about some sort of pressures that accounts feel when financial statements are needed urgently
Explanation:
1) As for using low estimates, this step was wrong on her part. she should have been upfront in her estimates. for the items that she could not estimate there should have been an indication that such items were still under review, instead of doing what she did to give the financial estimate a good look. Using guesses or deliberately using low estimates was a bad idea, GAAP would never condone that.
She should have met with the president and let him know that finalization of the financial statements would not possible within the time frame that he has given. She could have also explain that such delays are normal and she would have given estimates of when the draft internal copy would be made available to him. such steps she took could have resulted in serious consequences for the company
2) I would not inflate or deflate the figures on purpose to make financial statements look better. If it is time to present the draft and final year-end financial statements I will have to tell the truth on the numbers and estimations used and also the reasons for that. i would have explained the constraints that i was facing. if i was still being pressurized by the president, i would have no choice than to call it quits instead of going against the ethics of my profession, since there are both ethical and legal implications to not giving inaccurate financial statements.
Legazint most likely follows <u>b. a customer-based division</u>.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The customer-based division is generally followed in an organization to split the functional areas based on the customer demand. This is mainly followed due to increase in production and sales. The working departments are classified into separate categories.
In the above scenario, customer-based division is followed in the law firm. This was done for the facilitation of the clients. The staffs are organized into separate departments based on the client demands. The common departments are federally incorporated organizations, partnerships, corporations, sole proprietorship and limited liability companies.
