Answer:
balance the rights of both parties
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in a situation like the one being described a court will generally balance the rights of both parties. This is done in order to make sure that both parties are being treated fairly and investigate both sides of the case before making a decision in regards to who is in the right and who is in the wrong.
Answer:
a)
P 175
Q = 250
Profit6,250
b)
P 325
Q = 875
Profit 153,125
c)
Q = 1200
P = 260
Profit = 287,000
Explanation:
It maximize profit at MR = MC
MR = 200 - 0.2Q
MC = 150
150 = 200-0.2Q
Q = 50/0.2 = Q = 250
Price:
250 = 2000 - 10P
P = 1750/10 = 175
<u></u>
<u>Profit: revenue - cost</u>
$175 x 250 session - $150 per session = 6,250
<em>At new functions:</em>
150 = 500-0.4Q
Q = 350 / 0.4 = 875
Price:
875 = 2,500 - 5P
P = (2500-875)/5= 325
<u>Profit</u>
(325 - 150) * 875 = 153,125
<u>If cost changes:</u>
cost: 1000 + 20Q
marginal cost: 20
20 = 500 - 0.4Q
Q = 480 / 0.4 = 1,200
Price:
1,200 = 2500 - 5P
P = 1300/5 = 260
<u>Profit</u>
(260 - 20)Q - 1,000 = 287,000
Answer: countries would purchase microchips from japan because they are cheaper
Explanation:
I had to look for the options and here is my answer:
Based on the given description above, I can say that the Baumrind's parenting style that Matt and Tamela use is AUTHORITATIVE PARENTING. This is the type of parenting wherein parents impose limits on their children, but with a reason. Still, they respond to whatever their children needs.
Payable=outcome
receive=Income
