Answer:
$4 advantage
Explanation:
In this question we need to compare the cost between the relevant cost and the outside supplier cost
The relevant cost is
= Direct material per unit + direct labor per unit + variable manufacturing overhead per unit + fixed manufacturing overhead per unit
= $8 + $5 + $3 + $5 × 80%
= $8 + $5 + $3 + $4
= $20
Since 80% of the fixed manufacturing cost above is eliminated so we considered the same
And, the outside supplier cost is $16
So based on the above calculation, the financial advantage is
= $20 - $16
= $4 advantage
This shows the company should purchased from outside supplier as it saves $4
Answer:
B) 0.7; inelastic
Explanation:
The computation of the absolute value of the price elasticity of demand is shown below:
Elasticity is
= [(Sales - prior sales) ÷ ( Sales + prior sales) ÷ 2] ÷ [(price - dropped price) ÷ (price - dropped price) ÷ 2
= [(1,040,000 - 890,000) ÷ (1,040,000 + 890,000) ÷ 2] ÷ [(25,000 - 20,000) ÷ (25,000 + 20,000) ÷ 2]
= (150,000 ÷ 965,000) ÷ (5,000 ÷ 22,500)
= 0.15 ÷ 0.22
= 0.7
It is less than one so the demand is inelastic
Answer:
join pa dlet to get the answers
Explanation:
Answer:
- 3.21%
Explanation:
In this question, we use the PV formula which is shown in the spreadsheet.
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
Future value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 5% = 50
NPER = 34 years - 1 year = 33 year
Rate of interest = 9%
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the present value would be $581.42
Now the return would be
= Sale price + interest - purchase price
= $581.42 + $50 - $652.39
= -$20.97
And, the total return would be
= Return ÷ purchase price
= -$20.97 ÷ $652.39
= - 3.21%
If materials listed, perhaps the chemicals in them, safety precautions, etc.