The Pawnshop would be the highest risk for the customer.
Answer:
A. predictive validity.
Explanation:
The tool has predictive-validity because it can assess, or predict, out of a sample, which subjects will be depressed in the future, and which subjects will not, producing similar results to other tools that also measure depression, something that gives it credibility.
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
Answer:
We should discontinue Product B
Explanation:
We should check if Product B generates a contribution or not:
We subtract from the sales revenues the variable cost:
revenue 39,500
variable cost of goods sold (25,500)
variable selling expenses <u> (16,500) </u>
Contribution (2,500)
<em>As the contribution is negative, we should discontinue </em>Product B as is less expensevely to stop production than continue.
<span>Suppose that the price of sushi take-out, a substitute, decreases in price. What will happen to the demand for Chinese take-out? The demand for Chinese take-out will likely decrease as a substitute is cheaper. Those we are okay with substituting one item with another are often after the price the items sell out versus exactly what the want from the item. Since they are substitutes, more people will likely get the cheaper option, Sushi take-out. </span>
