Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
Answer:
frontotemporal dementia
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that the way that Mr. Weatherford is acting may be due to frontotemporal dementia. This is a type of dementia caused by cell degeneration in the frontal and temporal areas of the brain. Some of the symptoms associated with this disease are mood swings, compulsive behavior, and even a lack of inhibition, all of which Mr. Weatherford is demonstrating.
Answer:
According to the story, the principal wanted to make a special rule preventing Marta fromgetting the scholarship jacket. This is considered discrimination. In the context of this story,where does prejudice and discrimination come from? Cite evidence from this text, your ownexperience, and other literature, art, or history in your answer.3.Would it have been fair if the school had given the jacket to Joann? Why or why not?4.In your opinion, what makes a situation fair? Cite evidence from this text, your ownexperience, and other literature, art, or history in your answer.5.The narrator says, “Grandpa knew that I understood it was not a matter of money”(Paragraph 18). Is this true? What if the principal hadn’t decided to give Marta the jacketanyway?6.In the context of this story, what can – and can’t – money buy? Do you believe money canlead to happiness? Why or why not? Cite evidence from this text, your own experience, andother literature, art, or history in your answer.8
Answer:
Hieroglyphics
Explanation:
hieroglyphics refer to a hieroglyphic script. The Egyptians invented the pictorial script
Answer: A state constitution is the supreme law of that state. State constitutions establish certain organs of government for the State, vest these organs with their powers, and deny certain other powers.
Explanation:
