Thorndike's law of effect states that rewarding or satisfying behavior is more likely to be repeated.
<h3>What is Thorndike's law?</h3>
- According to Edward Thorndike's "Law of effect," any behavior that is followed by pleasant consequences is likely to be repeated, whereas any behavior that is followed by unpleasant consequences is likely to be stopped.
- If you work hard and then get a promotion and a pay raise, you are more likely to put in more effort at work in the future. If you run a red light and then get a traffic ticket, you are less likely to run another red light in the future.
- Thorndike developed the theory of connectionism through his research on animal behavior and the learning process of cats.
The complete question is:
Kim enjoys skiing and finds that she goes on the slopes as often as she can. Kim's behavior may be explained by Thorndike's Law of Effect, which states that:
a. the whole of human behavior is greater than the sum of its parts.
b. behavior that is rewarding or satisfying is likely to be repeated.
c. the causes of behavior generally cannot be studied systematically.
d. recreational preferences are typically shaped through classical conditioning.
To learn more about Thorndike's law, refer to:
brainly.com/question/15108002
#SPJ4
Duchenne muscular dystrophy which is an inherited disorder of progressive muscular weakness, typically in boys. <span>Symptoms include frequent falls, trouble getting up or running, waddling gait, big calves, and learning disabilities. (you can do more research on it if you want.)</span>
Answer:
inductive reasoning
Explanation:
There are essentially two different kinds of reasoning when it comes to new ideas:
- Inductive reasoning: This reasoning focuses in particular observations that will lead to generalizations.
- Deductive reasoning: This reasoning is the opposite of the first one and it focuses in generalizations and ideas which will be tested in particular observations.
Therefore, in inductive reasoning, empirical observations lead to new ideas.
Smartphone applications can offer real-time, customized interventions for quitting smoking. The current study evaluates the efficacy of a smartphone-based smoking cessation application that gave messages customized to current smoking lapse risk and specific lapse triggers and assessed risk for impending smoking lapse numerous times per day.
- A safety-net hospital's smoking cessation program recruited participants (N=59) who underwent five phone-based ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) every day for three weeks in a row.
- A new weighted lapse risk estimator was used to evaluate the risk of smoking lapse in real-time.
- Participants in each EMA received messages that were customized to their level of risk for an impending smoking lapse as well as their self-reported presence of smoking urges, stress, access to cigarettes, and motivation to quit.
- Using generalized linear mixed model analysis, it was assessed if communications that were specifically targeted towards lapse risk variables resulted in bigger decreases in these triggers than messages that weren't.
<h3>What results can we observe?</h3>
- In general, communications that were specifically matched to smoking urge, cigarette availability, or stress resulted in higher decreases in those triggers than messages that were not (p's=0.02 to 0.001).
- When only instances of high stress were included in the analysis, the connection between messages adapted to stress and higher reductions in stress than messages not tailored to stress was non-significant (p=0.892).
<h3>What can be concluded?</h3>
- Mobile technology can be utilized to deliver personalized treatment information and do real-time smoking lapse risk assessments.
- Findings offer the first concrete proof that customized material may have an effect on users' stress levels, temptation to smoke, and access to cigarettes.
To learn more about smoking cessation visit:
brainly.com/question/28044279
#SPJ4
The Sedition Act of 1918 (May 16, 1918) was an amendment to the Espionage Act of 1917 passed at the urging of President Woodrow Wilson.
