<span>You must carefully look for bicycles in traffic lanes because they: </span><span>Could be hidden in your blind spots.
The object will appear smaller in our eyes as its distance increased, and this situation could create a blind spot. When the bicycles are located behind traffic lanes, we may not see it coming because it may be hidden by cars/buses.</span>
Strong leadership from king henry
Mencius' political philosophy basically results from an extension of his doctrine of moral feelings. As he told the rulers, “If you let people follow their feelings (original nature), they will be able to do good” (Mencius 6A6). When Xunzi later attacked Mencius, one of his arguments was based on the concept of natural feelings.
Well since there no multiple choice I will tell you about the generation going now. Throughout history people have been expanding the use technology and a problem that this generation is using the resource given to you. So a concern that I suggest is the expansion of resources. Although some people don't use this because some families believe technology is not what "God" made so they don't bother to use and pushes this onto there kids.
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
