Based on Teddy Roosevelt's quote "We draw the line against misconduct, not against wealth," the option that explains his position is C. because trusts are not all bad, only those trusts which employ practices that do not benefit the public as a whole should be abolished. Roosevelt did not oppose the accumulation of wealth, but he did oppose the improper use of that wealth when it negatively impacted society overall as was the case with many trusts and monopolies in the late 19th and early 20th centuries (and in some cases today).
They Had Rich, Black Soil that lined the Nile, and they were able to grow an array of crops, Which were quite Successful and Ideal for necessary crops.
Although there are two people here who wanted to resist the authority in the non-violent way both Marcus Garvey and Gandhi, Garvey wanted black people to return to Africa (he didn't fight against colonial rule), which means that the correct answer is D. Mohandas Gandhi.He led a non-violent revolution in India, and wanted to get rid of the colonial rule of Britain.
Explanation:
Look for keywords in question
not having enough resources
this goes under <em>scarcity</em>... the condition that results from society not having enough resources to produce all of the things people would like to have...
(population is amount of people, animals, that type of thing)
(scarcity means lack of, not having enough)
(surplus means having more than needed, extra)
(plague means bacterial outbreak, cause continual trouble or distress to)
lmk if this helps XD
