Answer:
Washington Precedent 1 : established the Cabinet within the Executive Branch a body that was not outlined within the constitution
Washington Precedent 2 : supported innovative fiscal concepts such as the Bank of America and a national debt, which would be later adopted
Washington Precedent 3 : intoduced a policy of neutrality pertaining to foreign wars that was followed up until WW1
Washington Precedent 4 : set the precedent for a two term limit of Presidents that was followed until Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Washington Precedent 5 : established relations with Great Britain with Jay's Treaty. to this day England remains one of our closest and strongest allies
Washington Precedent 6 : established the tradition of a presidential farewell address
Explanation:
Washington made the office of the presidency powerful by appointing a cabinet and proposing major legislation to Congress. But at the same time he defined practices that emphasized the republican character of the position.
Answer: Colonists have the right to free speech and freedom of religion
Hope this helps
How to Evaluate the Credibility of a Source
We are constantly surrounded by information, and it is not always easy to know which sources to trust. Being able to evaluate the credibility of information is an important skill used in school, work, and day-to-day life. With so much advertising, controversy, and blogging going on, how do you sift through the chaff and cut to the chase?
Not all information is created equal. Just because you find information at the library does not guarantee that it is accurate or good research. In an academic setting, being able to critically evaluate information is necessary in order to conduct quality research. Each item you find must be evaluated to determine its quality and credibility in order to best support your research.
To evaluate a source consider the following:
Authority
Who published the source? Is it a university press or a large reputable publisher? Is it from a government agency? Is the source self-published? What is the purpose of the publication?
Where does the information in the source come from? Does the information appear to be valid and well-researched, or is it questionable and unsupported by evidence? Is there a list of references or works cited? What is the quality of these references?
Who is the author? What are the author's credentials (educational background, past writing, experience) in this area? Have you seen the author's name cited in other sources or bibliographies?
Is the content a first-hand account or is it being retold? Primary sources are the raw material of the research process; secondary sources are based on primary sources.
Currency
When was the source published? Is the source current or out of date for your topic?
Purpose
What is the author’s intention? Is the information fact, opinion, or propaganda? Is the author's point of view objective and impartial? Is the language free of emotion-rousing words or bias?
Is the publication organized logically? Are the main points clearly presented? Do you find the text easy to read? Is the author repetitive?
Answer:
A: by establishing civil rights legislation to integrate public schools
B: by adopting laws that prohibited segregation in Louisiana’s public schools
F: by creating a congressional committee to oversee desegregation
