Colonial governments were similar in that they were controlled by another powerful country.
For example, Great Britain's colonies in Nother America, Africa and Asia. They were all over the world but eventually controlled by powers in London.
Similar examples were seen when the United States colonized Phillipines and controlled it for many years.
However, they were different in that they all had seperate local governing bodies and signifcantly different laws and rules that reflected the needs and cultures of the local people.
“The original name ‘Flavian Amphitheatre’ was changed to the Colosseum due to the great statue of Nero that was located at the entrance of the Domus Aurea ‘The Colossus of Nero.’ The Domus Aurea was a great palace built under the orders of Nero after the Fire of Rome”
Answer:
A.) France
Explanation:
The 100 Years War, the Seven Years War, the Napoleonic War. Overall, England has a long history of war and rivalry with France.
The core of this lies in 1066, when the Duke of Normandy conquered England. From then on England moved out of the North European world and into the French world. Since England’s King was a prominent French Duke it was inevitable that England and France would play a role in each others history from then on.
And this in a way, I think is a point against France.
--------------
hopefully my answer helps! ♡
if my answers helped you please tell me, therefore I know.. that I did them correctly or incorrectly. anyways, have a great day/night!
Checks and Balances was designed to keep each branch from assuming too much power. Presidential power is checked and balanced in many ways. While he can veto various bills and keep them from becoming laws, he can be overridden by a 2/3 vote in both houses. SO if the Congress feels like the President is over stepping his bounds then they can in turn overrule him. The Supreme Court is also in the mix in that if they deem a law to be unconstitutional then they can rule it so and the law is no more. Presidents can influence Supreme Courts by whom they nominate for open positions (or in the case of one President, attempt to add more judges to the Court). However, after the nomination is made and the Senate approves and confirms them then they are free. The only way a Judge can be removed is they are found to be doing something illegal, deemed incompetent and unable to continue doing their job, resign, or die. This allows judges to "operate outside the realm of politics." The idea is that they can focus and not worry about politics and we can assume that decisions will be made free from political influences and bribery.
