1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bogdan [553]
3 years ago
11

What is the main difference between the roles of state and federal judges and other elected officials?

History
2 answers:
jonny [76]3 years ago
8 0

The answer is C

C. Judges cannot be removed from office; elected officials can be removed from office.

The judges have more independence and autonomy in their work, so much so they cannot be removed from office at least they go against the constitution, on the contrary, elected officials can be removed, investigated or penalized from office by the attorney general's office if they commit grave offenses.

r-ruslan [8.4K]3 years ago
8 0

The difference between the roles of state and federal judges and elected officials is that judges make decisions based on the law and elected officials serve the public will

You might be interested in
What type of source is the Profession of Faith issued by the Council of Trent, 1545-63?
Effectus [21]

On 15 March 1517, the Fifth Council of the Lateran closed its activities with a number of reform proposals (on the selection of bishops, taxation, censorship and preaching) but not on the major problems that confronted the Church in Germany and other parts of Europe. A few months later, on 31 October 1517, Martin Luther issued his 95 Theses in Wittenberg.

<span>A general, free council in Germany</span>

Luther's position on ecumenical councils shifted over time, but in 1520 he appealed to the German princes to oppose the papal Church, if necessary with a council in Germany, open and free of the Papacy. After the Pope condemned in Exsurge Domine fifty-two of Luther's theses as heresy, German opinion considered a council the best method to reconcile existing differences. German Catholics, diminished in number, hoped for a council to clarify matters.

It took a generation for the council to materialise, partly because of papal reluctance, given that a Lutheran demand was the exclusion of the papacy from the Council, and partly because of ongoing political rivalries between France and Germany and the Turkish dangers in the Mediterranean. Under Pope Clement VII (1523–34), troops of the Catholic Holy Roman Emperor Charles V sacked Papal Rome in 1527, "raping, killing, burning, stealing, the like had not been seen since the Vandals". Saint Peter's Basilica and the Sistine Chapel were used for horses. This, together with the Pontiff's ambivalence between France and Germany, led to his hesitation.

Charles V strongly favoured a council, but needed the support of King Francis I of France, who attacked him militarily. Francis I generally opposed a general council due to partial support of the Protestant cause within France, and in 1533 he further complicated matters when suggesting a general council to include both Catholic and Protestant rulers of Europe that would devise a compromise between the two theological systems. This proposal met the opposition of the Pope for it gave recognition to Protestants and also elevated the secular Princes of Europe above the clergy on church matters. Faced with a Turkish attack, Charles held the support of the Protestant German rulers, all of whom delayed the opening of the Council of Trent.

8 0
3 years ago
What 7 things change supply?​
cluponka [151]

Answer:

Natural Conditions Technical Progress  Change in Factor Prices Transport Improvements) Calamities ) Monopolies Fiscal Policy.

5 0
3 years ago
2. Narmer wears the crown of Upper Egypt on one side of the palette and the crown of Lower Egypt on the other. What might this s
Arturiano [62]

Answer:

Narmer wears the crown of Upper Egypt on one side of the palette and the crown of Lower What might this symbolize? The crown symbolizes unification between upper and lower egypt beings rules until one ruler. Also, historical representation of unification.

3 0
3 years ago
Hard times in Jamestown
andriy [413]
???? Do u even want an answer or nah
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Opinion:
kramer
I think yes but in a different way because without the boston tea party, the intolerable acts will probably never been made.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!!! <br> What was the purpose of the Taft-Hartley Act? And what do the acts contain ?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of Columbus's explorations?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the intent of the Roosevelt Corollary?
    11·1 answer
  • In the late 1800s what motivated the united states to claim territories abroad
    8·1 answer
  • Who was angered by the Russian invasion of Manchuria
    14·1 answer
  • What makes Constantinople’s location such a great place for trade (wealth), travel, and the spread of ideas.
    8·1 answer
  • What comes to mind when you hear the term “the Renaissance”
    13·2 answers
  • What conflict do the Navigation Acts and mercantilism set the stage for?
    13·1 answer
  • Why were the first labor unions organized?
    10·2 answers
  • HURRY I NEED THIS BY TODAY 10 POINTS!!!! PLEASE ANSWER
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!