Answer:
net income $2,568
Explanation:
Net income = revenues - expense
We will list the revenues and the expenses accounts:
Fees Earned 7,304
Wages Expense 3,335
Rent Expense 844
Utilities Expense 330
Depreciation Expense 160
Miscellaneous Expense 67
Total expenses 4,736
Net Income 2,568
Answer:
Discrimination against women and other minorities
Explanation:
The most likely ground for concern would be Discrimination against women and other minorities.
Diversity in the workplace means that an organization employs a diverse team of persons that reflects the views of the society in which it exists and operates. Through diversity and inclusion, no employee is treated unfairly on account of their gender, race, ethnicity.
Discrimination in labor markets, occurs when workers who have the same skill levels by education, experience, and expertise receive different pay because of their race or gender.
$127.27
Price index is (new year/old year)*100
If 2005 is the base/old year, then:
$700/550 = 1.27273 * 100 = $127.27
Price index is used to show inflation from year to year by the change in price for the same goods in a base year to current year. Price index for the base year compared to the base year will always be 100, so anything above that shows inflation.
Answer:
perceived behavioral control
Explanation:
According to my research on the theory of planned behavior, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the factor most likely to interfere with Tom quitting smoking is his perceived behavioral control. This is defined as the individuals perception of believing whether or not a behavior is within their control. If Tom does not believe quitting smoking is in his control, then he will not be able to quit regardless of how many people tell him how important it is to do so.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Full question:
In some states and localities, scalping is against the law although enforcement is spotty
A. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a weakly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets.
B. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a strongly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets
Answer and Explanation:
A. For the first scenario, a weakly enforced antiscalping law would still allow the resale of tickets as it is not enforced properly. Therefore it's effect on price would remain as though there were no laws restricting scalping( scalping: price increase created by artificial shortage and bulk resale of tickets) . See the attached diagram for the supply and demand curve and price increase as a result of a weak antiscalping law
B. For the second scenario, scalping has no effect on price as antiscalping laws are strong and therefore there is no scalping. Price remains the same and does not change.
In diagram A for first scenario price increases from p1 to p2 and quantity decreases from q1 to q2 to indicate increase in price and quantity decrease for shortage respectively. This shows the effect of scalping on the market with weak antiscalping laws
In diagram B, price and quantity remain the same to show strong antiscalping laws