Answer:
C. Which do you like?
Explanation:
It is a complete sentence.
Can u give us more details. Like what negative review do u mean?
Sanger Rainsford does not believe that animals feel anything when they are hunted because they have no "understanding." Rainsford is on a yacht on his way to hunt jaguar in the Amazon when he has a discussion about this with the ship's captain, Whitney. Whitney is certain the animals understand the fear of pain and death, at least, as they are being hunted. Rainsford quickly dismisses Whitney's view, calling him a philosopher for thinking this way.
"Nonsense," laughed Rainsford. "This hot weather is making you soft, Whitney. Be a realist. The world is made up of two classes--the hunters and the huntees. Luckily, you and I are hunters."
Obviously the primary external conflict in this story is between Rainsford and General Zaroff, who has decided to make Rainsford his prey in a challenging hunt. Literally, Rainsford must fight to save his life, and that is certainly an external conflict for him. The inner conflicts caused by Zaroff hunting him are several. First, Zaroff graciously gives Rainsford the choice between being hunted and being tortured by the formidable Cossack, Ivan. Though it does not seem like much of a choice, it is still a choice--and that is exactly what an internal conflict is, having to make a choice.
A second choice/conflict is more implied that explicit: will Rainsford do whatever he has to in order to survive this ordeal of being hunted? While he is certainly going to do whatever he can to save his own life, he must decide if he is willing to kill Zaroff if it means saving his own life. Again, this may not sound like much of a choice, but it is a weighty thing to kill another human being--unless you are the same kind of person as General Zaroff and Ivan, of course. And that is the crux of Rainsford's choice: will he be like them or will he choose something different.
We know what Rainsford chose, but we can assume that he spent his three days of being hunted wondering both how he was going to save himself (another kind of internal conflict) and what he would do if he had to kill Zaroff to stay allive. He was the hunted and he did feel the fear of pain and the fear of death, though he once scoffed at Whitney for believing this. Having to change your mind about something, especially something you were so certain about, is yet another kind of internal conflict.
The assignment aims to analyze your arguing and writing skills. For this reason, I cannot write your essay, but I will show you how to write it.
<h3>Essay structure</h3>
- Introduction: Write a very short paragraph. This paragraph should introduce the subject of your essay, that is, it should introduce who Liesel is and her relationship with books.
- Thesis statement: Write only one sentence that should end the introduction. This sentence should show your opinion about Liesel stealing and burning forbidden books. You must show whether you believe she acted correctly or not.
- Body. Write two long paragraphs. In the first paragraph, you will explain your thesis statement and show the reader what makes you have this opinion about Liesel's actions. You must show facts and evidence to support your opinion. In the second paragraph, you will show an opinion contrary to your thesis statement and will explain the reasons that make this opinion wrong.
- Conclusion: You will restate the most important points of your essay and highlight how your thesis statement is relevant.
Below you can see an example of how the introduction and thesis statement can be done.
<em>Liesel's actions about books banned by Nazi Germany is one of the great points of "The Book Thief" that shows us how Nazism was oppressive and a limiting factor of knowledge. Accordingly, it is possible to determine that Liesel's actions in stealing and burning forbidden books were a sign of resistance and protest against this system.</em>
Learn more about Liesel:
brainly.com/question/8374761
#SPJ1
