Answer:
EU members share a customs union; a single market in which capital, goods, services, and people move freely; a common trade policy; and a common agricultural policy.
Because Norman is asked to evaluate and provide evidence against allegations of child abuse, this most likely indicates that Norman is a <u>forensic psychologist</u>.
<h3>Who are
forensic psychologist?</h3>
These are the psychologists that apply psychological theory to criminal investigation in order to help understand the psychological problems associated with criminal behaviour and the treatment of those who have committed offences. These set of psychologists work with all aspects of the criminal justice system.
Mainly, these forensic psychologists work with the psychological aspects of investigation, legal process, offending behaviour and apply their psychological methods to reduce the impact of this and future re-offending. They also design and implement treatment programs and expert witness courtroom testimony.
In conclusion, as Norman is asked to evaluate and provide evidence against allegations of child abuse, this most likely indicates that Norman is a forensic psychologist.
Read more about forensic psychologist
brainly.com/question/13762870
#SPJ1
The correct answer is A and B they are both landlocked
Answer:
B- Variable ratio
Explanation:
In operant conditioning, a variable-ratio schedule is a schedule of reinforcement where a response is reinforced after an unpredictable number of responses. This schedule creates a steady, high rate of responding.
Shea is purchasing the tickets despite losing the other time, which conforms with the reinforcement and rate of response.
Gambling and lottery games are good examples of a reward based on a variable ratio schedule.
Answer: c. Admissible to prove Marcia's motive for committing the crime
Explanation:
Judging crimes are complex task to do at courts, especially when it's a critical case and the party who committed it has an evidence for their action.
Marcia Brady has been charged to court for murder, but before her action, she presents to the court why it ended up so, The court should rule that the letter admissible to prove Marcia's motive for committing the crime.