They agreed either because they were forced by their chief or the Spaniards or because they wanted to.
Positive effect:
Benefited the people at the top.
A flexible system making power and decision.
Allowed stability and security.
The lord had a unique relationship with his vassals.
Created an obligation for the powerful to help and protect the weak.
Negative effect:
90% of population were were commoners or peasants.
Serfs has no say in that time.
The kings were not in direct control of all their subjects.
Relied on gaining status through work and power.
1. The political ideals of freedom and equality and the theory of their institutional realization.
2. The articulation and promotion of toleration of religious diversity as a virtue to be respected in a well ordered society.
Answer:
The right answer is d.
Explanation:
Jalaladin Muhammad Akbar (1556-1605) was one of the greatest rulers of Indian history. Although a Muslim himself, he practiced a policy of tolerance of Hinduism, the religion of the majority of his subjects. He was a formidable warrior that led an impressive war machine, but he also used diplomacy as a tool to reach his goals, forging alliances with some local Hindu rulers when possible, and even marrying princess Jhoda Bai, a Hindu noble woman, for political reasons.
It's kinda hard to explain but I found a reliable website
http://www.history.com/topics/mcculloch-v-maryland
