Answer:
D). All of the above.
Explanation:
As per the question, all the given statements assert the outcomes of different court decisions of the years 1944, 1946, and 1948. In Smith Vs. Allwright case, the ap-ex court of the U.S. declared that the voters can not be outcasted from the voting rights by discriminating against them on the grounds of race. While in <u>Morgan Vs. Virginia case, the supreme court announced that it was unconstitutional(violation of the constitution) to segregate the riders on the basis of their race in interstate commercial buses</u>. And in the Shelly v. Kraemer case, the court declared the racially confining covenants to be the breach of the 14th amendment that declares 'equal protection to all its citizens regarding the rights of property, freedom, and life.' Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
The correct answer is:
A governor approves a law removing taxes that had previously been applied to all goods shipped into her state from neighboring states.
A laisez-faire s an economic system in which transactions between private parties are free from government intervention such as regulation, privileges, tariffs, and subsidies This doctrine supports that the interactions of economic agents in the markets, would produce the most efficent outcomes, as long as these are not externally influenced.
Well, America mostly used Rome's ideas and beliefs, but I do believe it is either A or B, mostly B. A secular government is the freedom of religious persecution.
I hope this helps.
