The statement is true. A project manager may "also" be the project champion. But it is not mandatory. But there are possibilities that the project manager is also an expert the in project he is handling. Thus, the above statement is true. If the statement would have been - The project manager will be or needs to be the project champion, then it would be false statement.
Answer:
- $700,000
<u>- 82,270</u>
<u>- </u> $617,730
- present value of $1: n=4, i=5%
- the present value of an ordinary annuity of $1: n=4, i=5%
Explanation:
Amount to be recovered (fair value): $700,000
Less: Present value of the residual value ($100,000 x .82270*): 82,270
Amount to be recovered through periodic lease payments: $617,730
Lease payments -: end of each of the next four years: ($617,730 ÷ 3.54595**) $174,207
* present value of $1: n=4, i=5%
** present value of an ordinary annuity of $1: n=4, i=5%
Answer:
B. lower than
Explanation:
As orange has a positive externality which cannot be included in the cost, the social optimal will be lower. That's because, neither the consumer will pay to benefit the entire society a higher price than their marginal utility or the producer produce when marginal cost exceed the marginal revenue
The government should try to subsidize the market to allow for a hiher quantity of organge an achieve the socially optinal quantity.
Answer:
$11,200
Explanation:
As not mentioned in the account. It is Assumed that the Larry and Bird are related parties and Bird made a sale at a transfer price of $40,000 with $24,000 cost of inventory.
Bird can only recognize the equity up to the ratio of inventory used or sold by the related party.
As 30% was not consumed then consumption will be 70%, so 70% of the income is realized and it will be recorded.
Equity Income = $40,000 - $24,000 = $16,000
Realized Equity income = $16,000 x 70% = $11,200
* There is some ambiguity in the question given.
<h3>Hello there!</h3>
Your question asks if you offer up your car as a demonstration that you will pay off your loan, would your car be used as collateral?
<h3>Answer: True</h3>
The reason why your answer would be "True" is because you're offering up your car for something that could not be very certain to do.
If you offered your car as a demonstration to pay off your loan, but you don't pay off the loan, the bank has every right to take the car from you, due to the fact that the car is on collateral.
Collateral is known as something that is "forfeited" or "security" for a repayment of a loan.
In this situation, you're offering your car as collateral if you don't pay the loan back. And if you don't pay the loan back, you're going to forfeit your car to the bank in order for them to use it as a way to get money to pay off the loan themselves. Banks, bail bonds, etc. usually have people put things up for collateral to keep a "safe" measure for the loan, due to the fact that they're giving people instant money. It's just a "security" or "safety" procedure banks due in order to get something in return if the loan is not paid off, so they won't be losing money or leave empty handed.
<h3>I hope this helps!</h3><h3>Best regards, MasterInvestor</h3>
