The supreme court introduced a two-part test, known as the "Sherbert" test (or balancing test) to determine whether the government was violating an individual's "free exercise" of religion.
The Sherbert test guarantees that government doesn't take unjustified activities that obstruct a man's religious flexibility. The United States court framework has embraced the Sherbert test to decide whether the legislature has fittingly allowed or denied joblessness benefits in light of the job one's religion had in his or her job loss.
The test causes the courts to decide whether the individual's case of having a true religious conviction is exact and if the administration's activities load a man's capacity to follow up on his or her convictions. Moreover, the test requires the administration to decide whether it has acted to the state's advantage and on the off chance that it has done as such in a way that is slightest prohibitive to a man's religion.
Answer: True
Explanation: Knowledge comes through experience, how we relate to things, how observant we are to things about us, how we tend to interact with people will always determine how we know things. So yes logically what we know is as a result of how we relate and interact we people and things around us.
The land structure, being flat or with hills. Could provide a lack or increase of defense, hills being used as a shield. Bodies of water have been used to hide out, but also provide drink to soldiers, foggy weather can make it difficult to see the enemy.
Answer:
A. An intermittent reinforcement schedule
Explanation:
