1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iren2701 [21]
3 years ago
11

Who fought in the French and Indian War? Why?​

History
1 answer:
sergejj [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Great Britain and France

Explanation: The French and Indian War began over the specific issue of whether the upper Ohio River valley was a part of the British Empire, and therefore open for trade and settlement by Virginians and Pennsylvanians, or part of the French Empire.

You might be interested in
Niccolo machiavelli in the prince and thomas hobbes in leviathan both advocated that a ruler should
Maurinko [17]
The correct answer is <span>B. Employ absolute power to maintain order in the areas under their rule.
Machiaveli's idea about ruling was that it is better to be feared that to be loved. Thus a ruler, a king, emperor, or whoever was in charge of a country, had to have absolute power over everyone and instill fear in his or her subjects so that they cannot even think about rebelling. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Which BEST describes the Vedas?
Elenna [48]
What best describes the Vedas are that they are a large body of scripts dating back from Ancient India. They are extremely important in Hinduism, as they are the oldest scriptures and are written in Sanskrit. People feel differently about the Vedas, as orthodox people see it as sacred while some people do not see it as authoritarian.<span />
3 0
3 years ago
Your cousin begins to run three times per week, carefully following the FITT principles. Describe how your cousin's cardiovascul
Jobisdone [24]

 these changes will be monitor with heart rate monitor and a weighing scale.

Explanation:

-the one and only kitkat

4 0
2 years ago
Part of the reason welfare programs became so unpopular was that
photoshop1234 [79]
Suck a fat ockkkkkkkkkkkkk
7 0
3 years ago
What was a MAIN reason why the Eastern Roman Empire lasted so much longer than the Western Roman Empire?
zhenek [66]

Answer:

"Fall of Rome" redirects here. For other uses, see Fall of Rome (disambiguation).

"The Fall of the Roman Empire" redirects here. For the film, see The Fall of the Roman Empire (film).

The fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called the fall of the Roman Empire or the fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2][3]

376, unmanageable numbers of Goths and other non-Roman people, fleeing from the Huns, entered the Empire. In 395, after winning two destructive civil wars, Theodosius I died, leaving a collapsing field army and the Empire, still plagued by Goths, divided between the warring ministers of his two incapable sons. Further barbarian groups crossed the Rhine and other frontiers and, like the Goths, were not exterminated, expelled or subjugated. The armed forces of the Western Empire became few and ineffective, and despite brief recoveries under able leaders, central rule was never effectively consolidated.

By 476, the position of Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power, and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Barbarian kingdoms had established their own power in much of the area of the Western Empire. In 476, Odoacer deposed the last emperor in Italy, and the Western Senate sent the imperial insignia to the Eastern Emperor.

While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again. It never again controlled any portion of Western Europe to the North of the Alps. The Eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire survived, and though lessened in strength remained for centuries an effective power of the Eastern Mediterranean.

While the loss of political unity and military control is universally acknowledged, the Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Alfonso de Albuquerque did all of the following except
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following pardoned Richard Nixon stating that he believed it was time to put what
    12·1 answer
  • R
    10·1 answer
  • The island of Crete was inhabited by the _____.
    12·1 answer
  • Can someone help me please?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following historic Indian cultures did Hernando De Soto come in contact with during his expedition? (Choose all tha
    9·1 answer
  • True or false :a change in the price of a product will not cause that for products demand curve to shift.
    12·1 answer
  • What were some contributing factors in the spread of domestic terrorism? Check all that apply
    13·2 answers
  • Which country was a dominion of great Britain A. australia B. canada C. new zealand D. india
    11·1 answer
  • How might the events described here relate to your findings in Doc B?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!