All categories

4 years ago

Identify the statement that describes the relationship between property and voting rights in America.

Social Studies

1 answer:

Andrews [41]4 years ago

7 0

Answer: <u>By 1860 in all but one state, land ownership was not required to vote</u>

Explanation:

Constitution gives every citizen right to participate in the process of forming the government by the way of bestowing upon them right to vote. But who has this right to vote has always been a big question as over period of time, the eligibility criteria has undergone many changes.

By the year 1790 many states in U.S. made the property or land ownership as the qualification for exercising the right to vote as a result of which women and blacks were disqualified from voting. But with time this qualification criterion was also changed and by 1860 except in one state, land ownership was not necessary for exercising the voting rights.

You might be interested in

Merits of rule of law

brilliants [131]

The rule of law has been linked to a number of positive social outcomes, including higher rates of economic growth, less violence, reduced inequality, better health, and higher literacy.

More detail about this is provided below.

<h3>Just what are the benefits of a government based on the rule of law?</h3>

One of the many advantages of a society based on the Rule of law is that it helps to protect the judicial system's autonomy. Modern conceptions of the Rule of Law involve safeguarding the judicial system's impartiality.

This indicates that wherever the Rule of Law functions in the true and contemporary meaning of the term, there is an increase in the independence of the judicial system.

Stronger economic growth, more peace, less inequality, better health outcomes, and more educational opportunities have all been linked to the rule of law.

You may learn more about the concept of rule of law at this link: brainly.com/question/12469633

#SPJ1.

8 0

2 years ago

List 4 social issues

JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

the four social issues are

1)Social stratification.

3)Economic issues.

3)Social disorganization.

4)Public health.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If a president claims the power to take an action not enumerated in the Constitution, like suspending the writ of habeas corpus,

Kitty [74]

Answer:

Inherent power, is the right answer.

Explanation:

Those powers of the President of the United States that are not mentioned clearly in the Constitution of the United States, are known as the inherent powers. Such powers are essential for a division of management to execute their duty. Basically, the inherent powers are given to the President so that he can effectively deliver his duty towards his nation. Therefore, a president can claim the power to take any action not enumerated in the Constitution, which is justified by the inherent power of the President.

3 0

3 years ago

prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accor

Hatshy [7]

prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed

In this paragraph, those who were a part in crafting the Independence Declaration display their familiarity with 2d Treatise on Government: Of Civil Government of John Locke. sound judgment of particular circumstances-tells us that people should think long and hard before trying to overthrow any government, however evil.

To read more about Prudence click here brainly.com/question/24173722

#SPJ4

4 0

1 year ago

*you begin working on a task which normally takes you two hours to complete. your supervisor has just informed you that the task

Lera25 [3.4K]

In the given scenario above, it is only likely that the employee should tell his or her supervisor that the task requires two hours and explaining it to him or her why the task would not take in just one hour but two hours. It is because it is only appropriate to tell the supervisor the truth for the task does take two hours than just one hour for the task that has been given usually completes in two hours.

3 0

3 years ago