Answer:
follow tribal law
Explanation:
The tribal law is a set of rules and regulations that is based on The Natives' Indian culture. Active Native Indian tribes in United States tend to require their members to follow this law.
Government stance on Tribal law tend to be depended on the states.
For Washington , the state allowed active tribes to run and operate Tribal Court. This court stand as an independent establishment from the state court. It's specifically aimed to determine conviction for tribes member. People who offended the rules within the tribal law can be vetted and receive punishment in this court.
Geographic isolation and different living conditions.
Explanation:
Both the Neanderthal and the Homo sapiens shared the same ancestor, the Homo erectus. The Homo erectus managed to spread from Africa to Eurasia. The populations started to become geographically isolated from each other, and over time this caused speciation.
The Homo erectus from the far East, with the one from Europe, or the one from Africa, didn't had contact. This was due to big distance and natural barriers. Gradually this species was evolving, and because of the different living conditions and the geographic isolation at different places it started to develop different characteristics. This has led to evolution of different species over time, with the Neanderthal evolving in Eurasia, as well as the Denisovan Man, while in Africa it was the Homo sapiens that emerged.
E hope that helped lmk if it’s right have a good night
When Jeffersonian Americans sought "cultural independence" they meant that they wanted the freedom and "space" to live life the way they wished, without having to conform to the norms and customs of immigrant and other groups.
Based on the quote, critics of NAFTA might have claimed that:
A) Mexican workers would be unfairly taken advantage of
<h3>What can be deduced about the critics of NAFTA from the text?</h3>
The critics of NAFTA believe that Mexico was not as strong as the other countries who entered the trade agreement so the possibility that they will be taken advantage of was there.
Having read the above statement from the 1993 agreement of NAFTA, we can see that the reference to the United Mexican states must have proved that the union was needed to stand side by side with the American and Canadian states.
Critics might have believed that Mexico was vulnerable and could be unfairly taken advantage of in the deal.
Learn more about NAFTA here:
brainly.com/question/27372794
#SPJ1
