That does look impossible someone plz help this man out or girl I don’t wanna assume genders ya know
The answer to this question is: 47
Answer: A & C
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
HL is Hypotenuse-Leg
A) the hypotenuse from ΔABC ≡ the hypotenuse from ΔFGH
a leg from ΔABC ≡ a leg from ΔFGH
Therefore HL Congruency Theorem can be used to prove ΔABC ≡ ΔFGH
B) a leg from ΔABC ≡ a leg from ΔFGH
the other leg from ΔABC ≡ the other leg from ΔFGH
Therefore LL (not HL) Congruency Theorem can be used.
C) the hypotenuse from ΔABC ≡ the hypotenuse from ΔFGH
at least one leg from ΔABC ≡ at least one leg from ΔFGH
Therefore HL Congruency Theorem can be used to prove ΔABC ≡ ΔFGH
D) an angle from ΔABC ≡ an angle from ΔFGH
the other angle from ΔABC ≡ the other angle from ΔFGH
AA cannot be used for congruence.
Answer:
<h2>The easiest to solve for is x in the first equation</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the system of equation, x + 4 y = 14. and 3 x + 2 y = 12, to solve for x, we can use the elimination method of solving simultaneous equation. We need to get y first.
x + 4 y = 14............ 1 * 3
3 x + 2 y = 12 ............ 2 * 1
Lets eliminate x first. Multiply equation 1 by 3 and subtract from equation 2.
3x + 12 y = 42.
3 x + 2 y = 12
Taking the diffrence;
12-2y =42 - 12
10y = 30
y = 3
From equation 1, x = 14-4y
x = 14-4(3)
x = 14-12
x = 2
It can be seen that the easiest way to get the value of x is by using the first equation and we are able to do the substitute easily <u>because the variable x has no coefficient in equation 1 compare to equation 2 </u>as such it will be easier to make the substitute for x in the first equation.
