Which of the following statements is FALSE?

Social Studies

1 answer:

bearhunter [10]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The correct answer is:

d. Cocaine, the first topical anesthetic drug, was introduced in 1880.

Explanation:

It is certainly true that Cocaine was introduced in the medical field for its anesthetic use in 1880, nevertheless it was not the first topical anesthetic drug used by medicine. The first discovery about anesthetic purposes was in 1844 with the use of nitrous oxide. Later on, ether was introduced to the field of anesthetics in 1846, and finally specialists talked about chloroform in 1847 before the later use of cocaine as anesthesia in the medical spheres.

You might be interested in

What kind of landforms are found in greece?

qaws [65]

Rugged mountains where the land form in greece. northeast aegean and sporades

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Alex really enjoys learning about science. He doesn't really care what his grade in a science class is, as long as he feels like

patriot [66]

Answer:Learning goals

Explanation:Learning goals are internally driven goals in which a person desire is to acquire new skills and master them so that they can improve their competence. This is a person who will look for feedback on their prior activities in order to make changes and improve on the future.

8 0

3 years ago

Which theory best explains why our actions can lead us to modify our attitudes continuing to operate a fuel-inefficient car desp

Aneli [31]

Social Trap. i think it is so.

4 0

3 years ago

Can anyone help me keeney????????

Shkiper50 [21]

Keeney is always the answer

5 0

3 years ago

At some point, it will occur to you that there is this oddity in the argument: most people living in a civil society never actua

Dominik [7]

There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.

If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.

On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.

3 0

3 years ago