Answer:
The answer is explained below.
Explanation:
Unitary and Federal are types of government.
In unitary governance more power is exercised by the central government, there is very little power for local government and the central government uniformly applies its power throughout, it also takes all the major decisions. . Most of the unitary governments have been either totalitarian or democratic. France is a democracy governed by unitary form of government. UK and China also have unitary governments.
Power is diffused in federal form of government, is divided between local and federal governing bodies. Federal form of government is mostly found in multi national states and countries having diverse ethnicity. Belgium and US have have federal form of government.
Please add a picture of something, i need more work to answer this
The correct answer is B) Federalism.
Dividing power between the state and national levels is known as "Federalism."
The framers believed in the principle of Federalism that is the system of government where power is divided between a central government and regional governments. The framers of the U.S. Constitution granted some faculties to the national government and granted others to the states.
The framers respected the states because they were already functioning one way or the other the people of that time were font to their states.
In other words, when we talk about United States politics, the principle of federalism refers to that the power of the government is shared by the state governments and the federal government.
This power functions under a system of checks and balances in which none of the branches of the government was more powerful than the other two. In the US government system, when federal law conflicts with state law, the federal law will win. This is included in the Constitution as the Supremacy Clause.
Answer:
No need for revision, it's correct as it is.
Explanation:
“While most visitors to Washington, D.C., visit the well-known memorials, including the Washington Monument, the Lincoln and Jefferson memorials, and the more recent Vietnam Memorial Hall, a beautiful and lesser-known memorial”
The underlined sentence “Vietnam Memorial Hall, a beautiful and lesser-known memorial,” needs no further revision.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Argue a case for appointing judges and then argue a case for having them elected.
In the case of appointing judges, many experts agree on the idea that appointed is better because judges have to be neutral. They serve the Constitution, they do not serve any political party or particular interests.
Once appointed, the judges are going to ratify, so it is supposed that their integrity is double-checked.
In other cases, some arguments favor the election of judges, stating that people should be trusted to elect judges. Through this election, judges will be driven to serve the people who put their trust in them to impart justice.
If they are elected, some voices agree that judges should be elected for a determined period, so people could evaluate if they did a good during their tenure.
However, in both cases, some advantages and disadvantages have to be resolved by law experts and politicians in their respective states.
