Answer: No, your friend is not correct. You cannot use a similarity transformation to turn a square into a rectangle. Here's why:
1) If you used a similarity transformation, the size and position of the shape would change, but the shape itself remains the same.
2) Squares and rectangles are NOT similar.* Referring to the first point I listed, if the shapes are not similar, then a similarity transformation cannot be used to turn one shape into another.
<em>*Similar means that the edges are proportional to one another, such as a square with sides of 4 meters vs a square with sides of 2 meters: the sides are different lengths, but the shape is the same.</em>
I hope this helps! Please feel free to comment below if you need any clarification. Have a good day, and good luck on your assignment. :)
Answer:
-x+3
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
y = 
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Let Area be the independent variable and Price of the homes sold be dependent on the area.
Let x represents the area and y represents the price.
We will plot the data in excel using trend line function.
The model so obtained is:
y =
Rounding values to the nearest hundredth, we get
y =
Answer:
x ∈ (-∞, 3) U (6, ∞).
Step-by-step explanation:
We use factorization and optain
Then, we have two critical points: x=3 and x=6. Now:
(i) for x < 3 we have that x-6 <0 and x-3 <0. Then (x-6)(x-3) > 0.
(ii) for 3 < x < 6 we have that x -6 <0 and x -3 > 0. Then (x-6)(x-3) < 0.
(iii) for x > 6 we have that x-6 >0 and x-3 > 0. Then, (x-6)(x-3) > 0.
conditions (i) and (iii) satisfy the inequatliy, then the solution is x ∈ (-∞, 3) U (6, ∞).
The graph is in the picture below.
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
