Answer:
These findings present a direct challenge to the assumption that vicariously discharging aggressive impulses reduces aggression.
Explanation:
Some professionals think that people can reduce stress and diminish their feeling of anger by practising sports. Also, they think rough sports are commonly seen as a vicarious way of discharging agressive impulses. This is because spectators feel identified with the athlete, but in the example mentioned before, this theory proved to be inconsistent.
Political consultants use market research to help candidates understand micro-trends in the voting population that will allow the candidate specifically target those voters with messaging that will resonate.
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
Answer:
Research is practical and realistic because it is based on the scientific method, which demands that research should be start with an hypothesis, that should be falsifiable (meaning that it can be proven right or wrong), followed by a scientific study in which the hypothesis is tested.
If the hypothesis is proven to be true, it does not mean that is conclusions will hold true for eternity, they could be proven wrong by further studies.
For this reason, research is both practica, because it is based on a practical method: the scientific method, and realistic, because it has a limited scope, and limited, verifiable understanding of reality, and can be proven wrong with other studies.
Answer:
it is not right for us
Explanation:
<em>b</em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>a</em><em>u</em><em>s</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>d</em><em>e</em><em>s</em><em>t</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em>y</em><em>e</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>o</em><em>u</em><em>r</em><em> </em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>f</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>s</em><em>o</em><em>c</em><em>e</em><em>t</em><em>y</em><em>.</em>
