They weren't so successful at conquering Europe or China. Of course, one can blame the long supply lines, but in these cases their adversaries were also determined to repulse them.
In contrast, Byzantium and Persia were exhausted from mutual warfare. Tribes related by kinship to Muslim Arabs had served as mercenaries during this period, so there was a lot of tactical knowledge available.
The Byzantines retreated to the highlands of Anatolia upon losing their lower-lying provinces to the Muslims. I am not sure if they launched a determined counter-attack. The Persians did, but they could not fight coherently.
Answer:
Sure! the question is are you good with math? math is currently giving me loads of trouble
Explanation:
And are you good with song lyrics?
This will NOT determine if i want to be your friend or not! promise!
Answer:
The differences between the piety of 19th century Protestants (revivals), and 17th century Puritans and 18th century deists (some founding fathers) is discussed below in details.
Explanation:
- The Puritanism that occurred under those such as the Mathers is a perfect, wholly contrived, rather round concept that consisted of five separate agreements.
- The most important difference is that they considered predestination whereas the present Protestant has adopted Salvation by Grace.
- Puritans held the view that individuals were not created similar, and certain selves were decided for bliss, while others were not to be as blessed.
- On the other hand, Deists were strong devotees in the idea that every person was created equal.
