By formula we know that:
z (x) = (x - m) / [sd / sqrt (n)]
where x is the value we want to know (6.7), m is the mean (5), sd is the standard deviation (7.1) and n is the sample size (29).
Replacing we have:
z (6.7) = (6.7 - 5) / [7.1 / sqrt (29)]
z = 1.289
If we look in the normal distribution table (attached), we have that the probability is 0.8997, therefore:
1 - 0.8897 = 0.1003
So the conditional probability of a herd sample earning at least 6.7 pounds per steer is 10.03%.
Now the hypothesis tells me:
m> 5
The probability is somewhat low, therefore, the most correct thing is to reject the hypothesis even though it is a fact that can occur.
Answer:
Market A
Step-by-step explanation:
MA) 28/12= 2.33333
MB) 23.75/10= 2.375
MC) 15.75/6=2.625
Market A has the best price per shrimp
The correct question is
<span>Teresa graphs the following 3 equations: y=2x, y=x2+2, and y=2x2. She says that the graph of y=2x will eventually surpass both of the other graphs. Is Teresa correct? Why or why not?
we have that
y=2x
y=x</span>²+2
y=2x²
using a graph tool
see the attached figure
<span>We can affirm the following
</span>the three graphs present the same domain-----> the interval (-∞,∞)
The range of the graph y=2x is the interval (-∞,∞)
The range of the graphs y=x²+2 and y=2x² is the interval [0,∞)
therefore
<span>Teresa is not correct because the graph of y = 2x will not surpass the other two graphs since in the interval of [0, infinite) the three graphs present the same range</span>
With what? You didn’t put a picture lol
