Answer:
These terms exemplify central dispositions.
Explanation:
According to Gordon Allport, central dispositions, or central traits, are characteristics which tend to be present in almost every individual. They tend to be the foundation of one's personality, being the base or root. These tend to <em>describe an individual's overall character. </em>
Allport believes everyone has 5-10 central traits, to a certain extent.
For example, an individual can describe him/herself as being creative, persistent or reliable. This means these tend to be the individual's core traits.
The Treaty of Paris of 1763 (ended the French and Indian War/Seven Years' War between Great Britain and France, as well as their respective allies.) In the terms of the treaty, France gave up all its territories in mainland North America, effectively ending any foreign military threat to the British colonies there.
I believe the correct answer is fear can be learned via classical conditioning, and that fear can be generalized.
During this experiment, Watson presented Albert with a white mouse and a scary sound, so every time Albert saw a mouse, he was scared by the sound. Over time, he learned to be afraid of the mouse because he was expecting to be scared by the sound, even though the sound may not come. Thus, he learned to be afraid, and the fear was generalized not only to the mouse, but to anything white.
Matthew is being taught to use the potty through the process of <u>"shaping."</u>
Shaping is the way toward reinforcing progressively ever nearer approximations to a coveted terminal conduct. The shaping of conduct begins at an early age. For instance, a youngster figures out how to pull itself up, to remain, to walk and to at last move about through fortification of somewhat extraordinary cases of practices. Strolling doesn't really fall into place for a kid, yet through inconspicuous fortifications of having the capacity to achieve a toy or move all the more freely, the kid's conduct is shaped.
Answer: Normative ethics would generally ask what right action is. ... Metaethics, on the other hand, would call into question what it means to say that any action is "correct", whether this type of evaluation is objective or subjective, universal or particular
Explanation :
