You can carry out research on reliable sources to identify what life was like in Jamestown, using the social, economic and political characteristics of the colony to produce your illustration.
<h3 /><h3>What was life like in Jamestown?</h3>
Jamestown corresponds to the first English settlement in America being considered the capital of the colony, it was located in Virginia.
In the 1600s, life in Jamestown was difficult, with high rates of violence, insecurity, lack of resources and diseases, and the first settlers found it difficult to settle in the place, where climatic and soil conditions were unfavorable for agriculture and subsistence.
Therefore, the period that comprises the years 1609 and 1610, became known as the <em>"Time of the Famine"</em> in Jamestown, which, due to the scarcity of resources, caused most of the settlers to die due to the precariousness of living conditions.
Find out more about Jamestown here:
brainly.com/question/6700105
#SPJ1
According to a recent study by the Pew research center, 33% live with their parents or grandparents in 2016
This should really be from your point of view but as a psych minor I can say that the main values would be the ability to understand human development and overall health
Before psychology was actually considered people who had mental illness were not diagnosed, they were just locked away in a typical half way house for people who did not fit the 'norm; of society
Lobotomy was the general cure for someone who today we would call 'schizophrenic', these people were not treated as people and were not allowed everyday freedom in society as they are now.
Thanks to psychology we know that newborns need to be held and need skin- to- skin contact in order to develop healthy emotional bonds with their caregivers. we know that the average human needs about 7 hours of sleep in order to hit deep sleep and re-energize their muscles. psychology makes it easier to understand different people and to understand and express our emotions. i could go on forever but limited space here, feel free to msg me on this site if you need more info.
Answer:
Bahadur Shah Zafar was not a capable son of a capable father.
Explanation:
Although Bahadur Shah Zafar was a better and more courageous ruler than many of his predesessors he was not an administrator per se. He was more of a poet and an artist at heart than he ever was a king and it showed in his administration.
His father was a weaker ruler who would not think of revolting against the British, which is something that he did and had to suffer for it.
Zafar was instead an idealist king who found himself in too weak a position to ever hold power well enough.
