Answer:
No
Explanation:
The word "always" implied that the states should obey the federal government under any circumstances.
Most of the times, yes. I think it is important for the states to obey the federal government in order to maintain law and order in the country.
But, there's a chance that the federal government might impose a legislations that's violates the constitutions or human rights. At that point, the states need to be able to raise as the opposition from the central government.
Answer:
Voting Rights Act
Explanation:
The piece of legislation that was the most influential was the Voting Rights Act.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a law that was passed to totally eliminate the barriers that existed in stopping African Americans from exercising their rights to vote.
After the African Americans had gotten their freedom from slavery, they were still heavily prejudiced against and were segregated, prevented from doing certain basic things that other citizens enjoyed, such as voting.
Answer:
C) The creation of colonial-controlled legislatures
Explanation:
Part of the 1774 Coercive Acts (known by the colonists as the Intolerable Acts) was the Massachusetts Government Act, which repealed the Massachusetts Bay Colony's right to elect its own legislature, in effect turning it into a royal colony. Thomas Gage was made the royal governor and instituted martial law within the colony. Also, under these acts, many of the provisions of the Quartering Act, which had been repealed earlier, were put back into place. The Administration of Justice Act allowed trials to be held in locations outside of the area where the crime took place. Furthermore, the Boston Harbor was closed until the damages caused by the Boston Tea Party were repaid.
I am sorry if I got it wrong
Carnegie saw the problem during his time as the proper administration of wealth. He believed that the wealthy should be giving their money back to the community and less fortunate, not just solely benefiting from it themselves. Additionally, he believed that if the rich fulfilled their moral obligation then there would be no poverty.
Answer:
A. He spent most of his time growing food for his family.
Explanation:
They look like the africans who picked cotten from cotten feilds, They would not have owned a house.