1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
artcher [175]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following is not a true statement about the right to vote? A. Citizens may vote at the local, state, and federal le

vels. B. Voting allows citizens to have their voices heard. C. All citizens are required to vote. D. Voting is a way to affect the direction of government.
History
1 answer:
dem82 [27]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

C. All citizens are required to vote.

Explanation:

The right to vote refers that every citizen has the right to vote. They can be a vote for the local, state, federal levels as the case may be. This voting represents the citizens that their voices are heard and according to that they affect the government directions which the government wins and which the government loses. It  totally depends upon the citizen votes

But it is not necessary that all citizens are required to vote

Therefore the correct option is C.

You might be interested in
Why was britain against american idependence write in a paragraph
Sergio [31]

Answer:

Britain was against the American Independence because America would be the first colony to gain independence from its  western colonist and it would create a revolution and rebellion in other parts where britain had colonised.

Explanation:

The  news that America was finally going to be independent from the Britain, it shocked everyone. They were not expecting that Britain would let loose on the Americans.

The economic advantages were highly effected, America was a great hub of resources. Britain's were afraid that seeing how Americans have gained freedom, other countries might get the same idea and rebel.

3 0
3 years ago
What makes William J Bryan speech so powerful?
____ [38]
Bryan was the last of the Great Political Orators in some ways. He could speak at great length on any topic, using powerful imagery, often of a religious nature, to audiences raised on such language and imagery.

Unfortunately, the telegraph already was encouraging economy of language, and the radio would make long speeches less useful than shorter ones which reached the point quickly. People in churches no longer spent hours listening to a single sermon, and those who followed the earsteps of Abraham Lincoln learned that eloquence was not a matter of length, but of substance.

The “Cross of Gold” speech which he thought would propel him to the Presidency would not work today.

The only orators today who speak interminably tend to be dictatorial in nature, in love with their own voice, and whose followers dote on every word, no matter how repetitious. Bryan was leagues above that, but someone who seeks his skill will learn why society has passed the skills of the long-sermoned preacher by.

5 0
3 years ago
what is it wise to seek a return to normalcy after World War I? Did Harding and Coolidge's policies have a positive or negative
nignag [31]
I would think return to normalcy is always the goal. 
<span>and from a little researching, i would say that at least harding's policies had a positive effect. </span>

<span>"Revenues to the treasury increased substantially. Unemployment also continued to fall. Libertarian historian Thomas Woods contends that the tax cuts ended the Depression of 1920–1921 and were responsible for creating a decade-long expansion.Historians Schweikart and Allen attribute these changes to the tax cuts. Schweikart and Allen also argue that Harding's tax and economic policies in part "... produced the most vibrant eight year burst of manufacturing and innovation in the nation's history." The combined declines in unemployment and inflation (later known as the Misery Index) were among the sharpest in U.S. history. Wages, profits, and productivity all made substantial gains during the 1920s."</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was a direct result of the growth of the railroad industry
Temka [501]
Something directly associated to better transport lines: increased settlements in the West 
8 0
3 years ago
Descrobe the loss of life caused by The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

Ninety minutes after it began, the attack was over. 2,008 sailors were killed and 710 others wounded; 218 soldiers and airmen (who were part of the Army prior to the independent United States Air Force in 1947) were killed and 364 wounded; 109 Marines were killed and 69 wounded; and 68 civilians were killed and 35 wounded. In total, 2,403 Americans were killed, and 1,143 were wounded.[100] Eighteen ships were sunk or run aground, including five battleships.[9][101] All of the Americans killed or wounded during the attack were legally non-combatants, given that there was no state of war when the attack occurred.[20][21][102]

Of the American fatalities, nearly half were due to the explosion of Arizona's forward magazine after it was hit by a modified 16-inch (410 mm) shell.[nb 18] Author Craig Nelson wrote that the vast majority of the U.S. sailors killed at Pearl Harbor were junior enlisted personnel. "The officers of the Navy all lived in houses and the junior people were the ones on the boats, so pretty much all of the people who died in the direct line of the attack were very junior people", Nelson said. "So everyone is about 17 or 18 whose story is told there."[103]

Among the notable civilian casualties were nine Honolulu Fire Department (HFD) firefighters who responded to Hickam Field during the bombing in Honolulu, becoming the only fire department members on American soil to be attacked by a foreign power in history. Fireman Harry Tuck Lee Pang of Engine 6 was killed near the hangars by machine-gun fire from a Japanese plane. Captains Thomas Macy and John Carreira of Engine 4 and Engine 1 respectively died while battling flames inside the hangar after a Japanese bomb crashed through the roof. An additional six firefighters were wounded from Japanese shrapnel. The wounded later received Purple Hearts (originally reserved for service members wounded by enemy action while partaking in armed conflicts) for their peacetime actions that day on June 13, 1944; the three firefighters killed did not receive theirs until on December 7, 1984, at the 43rd anniversary of the attack. This made the nine men the only non-military firefighters to receive such an award in U.S. history.[104]

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • according to the declaration of independence what is the purpose of government when should the people have the right to change g
    10·1 answer
  • The west of 1800
    13·1 answer
  • What was a reason behind the tensions in Korea? a. both north and south were run by different government c. both north and south
    5·2 answers
  • During the 2008 presidential campaign, the two leading candidates for the Democratic nomination were an African American man and
    6·2 answers
  • An economic arrangement in which serfs lived and worked on a lord’s estate in return for food and protection could BEST describe
    12·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME ( i don't know if the answer thats checked is right) please help
    14·2 answers
  • Which was true after world war II ended?
    13·2 answers
  • what new direction did civil rights leaders take in the mid 1960s? how was this helpful,and how was this a problem?
    7·1 answer
  • THIS IS DUE AT 11:59!! HURRY!!
    14·1 answer
  • Why were many Mexican farmer laborers unaware of the terms of the contract they signed?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!