Opponents of preferential hiring practices argue that the only standard for awarding jobs is competence. Some people see strong affirmative action as reverse discrimination they argue that preferential treatment on the basis of race gender or minority status is always wrong.
Preferential hiring is an ethically legitimate means for compensating people for the harms that they have suffered.
They are experts in developing high-quality qualifications that meet the needs of employers and learners. They approve centres and work with them to ensure high quality delivery of qualifications and they carry out activity designed to assure the quality of the qualifications awarded.
Learn more about Preferential hiring here
brainly.com/question/16107189
#SPJ4
Answer:
stock price will not change at all
Explanation:
Based on the information provided it can be said that when the company releases its next earnings report the stock price will not change at all. This is because stock markets move fast, the stock price of EPS moved when the in the announcement about FDA approval was made. Therefore the markets already expect these changes to reflect on the earnings report so prices will not move. Just as the saying goes, "Buy the Rumor, Sell the news."
Answer:
these are the options,
- a. reliability
- b. assurance
- c. responsiveness
- d. empathy
and the correct answer is a. reliability.
Explanation:
As it is explained in the question, the company always delivers its promise. such a company lives up to the customer expectations by constantly providing value for customer's money, in the process, becoming a trustworthy and a reliable company and a brand.
Answer:
WACC of ABC Corporation is 91%
Explanation:
WACC = Kd * (1+T) * Debt/Debt+Equity + Ke * Debt/Equity
Kd = Cost of debt
T = Corporate tax rate
WACC = 0.08*(1-0.35)*(150m/150m+650m) + 0.10*(650m/150m+650m)
WACC = 0.08 *0.65*0.1875 + 0.10*0.8125
WACC = 0.00975 + 0.08125
WACC = 0.091
WACC = 91%
Therefore, the WACC of ABC Corporation is 91%
Answer:
d. pollution should be eliminated as long as the benefit from a cleanup exceeds the opportunity cost.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is defined as the forgone cost of doing a particular activity. If you were not undertaking this activity what would you have gained by doing something else?
In this case as long as the benefit from cleaning up the pollution is greater than the opportunity cost (pollution) it should be undertaken.
