1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yarga [219]
3 years ago
11

What is NOT an accurate description of Italy immediately before and during World War I?

History
1 answer:
Alex787 [66]3 years ago
8 0

Italy declared war on France to avenge French seizure of Tunisia is NOT an accurate description of Italy immediately before and during World War I.

Option: B

Explanation:

In world war I number countries of European continent were engaged and fought against States and other opponent countries. Italy German and Austria all three countries are combined in the Triple Alliance before the world war. Though the political relation in between Italy and Austria was not favorable .

As the relation was not good that's why Italy was eager to lay claim on thatwas actually under the custody of Austria. Triple Entente was signed at the early 1900s but Italy signed it during 1915. Italy and French were in same goal in world war I.

You might be interested in
What were some of the detriments for the native americans during the trail of tears???
guajiro [1.7K]

Ethnic cleansing and forcible removal of Native Americans from southeastern part of the United States.

Explanation:

  • With the "democratic relocation", the introduction to the genocide, the slow but sure death and disappearance of an entire nation and its civilization, a civilization that primarily took care of Nature, Mother Earth and coexistence with them, began to disappear - over time, buffaloes, wild horses, forests disappeared. other animals and plants, in the midst of the advent of the advanced civilization of modern barbarians, conquistadors and murderers.
  • The age of life on the reserves began, the precursors to future concentration camps.
  • Enclosed, partitioned and separated from its own libertarian, wandering nature, flooded with monsters of fiery water and white man's afflictions, the Indian began to wither and quietly extinguish himself, from within ...

Learn more on trail of tears on

brainly.com/question/1569361

brainly.com/question/795830

#learnwithBrainly

8 0
3 years ago
What trends shaped American culture during the depression?
Mnenie [13.5K]
Jazz, the womens flapper look, womens rights movement, gangs and prohibition.
6 0
3 years ago
What did American society look like in the mid 1800's​
dezoksy [38]
Here you’re answer


Due to changes in the economic structure of American life in the 1800s, cultural and social changes where different depending on a lot of stuff Heritage or you’re social class and so on.
5 0
3 years ago
What could be a result of a government not adhering to the rule of law? (Select all that apply.)
soldi70 [24.7K]

The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.

<em>The results of a government </em><u><em>NOT ADHERING</em></u><em> to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.</em>

The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.

So The results of a government <em><u>NOT ADHERING</u></em> to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is an example of a pictogram
lord [1]
This is what a pictogram looks like ok

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP! PLEASE HELP ME :))))
    14·1 answer
  • How was general MacArthur able to take the city of Inchon
    13·1 answer
  • How was Western Europe impacted with the Roman empire fell
    15·1 answer
  • Which measure can citizens use to vote down the state government's legislation?
    8·2 answers
  • How did Roosevelt change the role of the U.S. president during the New Deal?
    11·1 answer
  • When should you question a source credibility
    13·2 answers
  • Diseases.
    14·2 answers
  • Recall when European historians first used the term "medieval" to describe the past.
    11·1 answer
  • 3. Who where the blues and greens? Multiple choice
    13·2 answers
  • Industrial Revolution<br> 1. What is the difference between an invention and a discovery?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!