1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zarrin [17]
4 years ago
7

true or false that Abington school district v. Schempp established that illegally seized evidence could not be used in court?

History
1 answer:
Blababa [14]4 years ago
4 0
False

This case focused on forced religion in public schools. The case revolves around a Pennsylvania school that forced students to hear and read different parts of the Bible as part of their curriculum. Schempp argued that this is a violation of the first amendment right of freedom of speech, as the state (aka any government/public entity) should not promote a specific religion. The Supreme Court judges voted 8-1 in favor of Schempp.
You might be interested in
Where is california hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:

next to Nevada

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The illustration shows the 1893 World's Fair lit by one its main attractions, electric light. Whose inventions MOST
Marysya12 [62]

Answer:Thomas Edison

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Who sent his army to invade oil-rich Kuwait in August 1990?
den301095 [7]
B. Saddqm Hussein I hope it helps
4 0
3 years ago
What are the strongest three arguments that go against Kaepernick’s decision to kneel during the national anthem?
mixas84 [53]

Answer:

Explanation:

Pro 1

When one believes the United States is not living up to its ideals of freedom, liberty, and justice for all, kneeling during the national anthem is appropriate and justified.

Colin Kaepernick said, “I’m not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color… To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder.” Many other athletes have since refused to stand for the national anthem for similar reasons.  Denver Broncos linebacker Brandon Marshall, who also has knelt during the national anthem, said, “the message is I’m against social injustice… I’m not against the military or police or America at all.”  NASCAR official and Army veteran Kirk Price, who kneeled during the anthem at a June 2020 race, stated, “I fully respect the flag… That’s not what the issue is here. The issue is African Americans being oppressed for so long under the flag… But to be honest with you, I know what the flag stands for and I know about Black people being oppressed because I am one.”

Con 1

Kneeling during the national anthem shows disrespect for the flag and members of the armed forces.

The national anthem pays respect to the people who have risked their lives, been injured, or died defending the United States. Carole Isham, a great-great-great-granddaughter of the writer of the national anthem (Francis Scott Key) stated that “it just blows my mind that somebody like (Kaepernick) would do what he does to dishonor the flag of this country and the national anthem when we have young men and women overseas fighting for this country, people that have died for this country.” Drew Brees, New Orleans Saints quarterback, supported Kaepernick’s message but disagreed with the delivery: “t’s an oxymoron that you’re sitting down, disrespecting that flag that has given you the freedom to speak out.” Brees reiterated his position on June 3, 2020 in the wake of the George Floyd killing. However, in light of the backlash that followed, Brees retracted his statement. In reaction, on June 5, 2020, President Trump tweeted, “OLD GLORY is to be revered, cherished, and flown high… “We should be standing up straight and tall, ideally with a salute, or a hand on heart. There are other things you can protest, but not our Great American Flag – NO KNEELING!”

Pro 2

When a national figure such as an NFL player kneels during the national anthem, it shocks people into paying attention and generates conversation.

Many people were shocked and offended when Colin Kaepernick refused to stand for “The Star-Spangled Banner,” and the resulting debate has continued as additional players joined the protest. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell originally disagreed with those actions, but later praised what he called a movement from protest to progress: “I truly respect our players wanting to speak out and change the community… We want them to use that voice.” Social media has given a voice to strong opinions on both sides, including members of the armed forces who express support Kaepernick’s right to protest by posting under the hashtag

Con 2

Kneeling during the national anthem is an ineffective and counterproductive way to promote a cause.

Clemson University football coach Dabo Swinney said in a press conference: “I don’t think it’s good to be a distraction to your team. I don’t think it’s good to use your team as the platform.”  President Obama expressed concern that not standing for the national anthem can get in the way of the message: “As a general matter, when it comes to the flag the national anthem and the meaning that holds for our men and women in uniform and those who’ve fought for us — that is a tough thing for them to get past to then hear what his [Kaepernick’s] deeper concerns are.” Malcolm Jenkins, safety for the Philadelphia Eagles, supported Kaepernick’s message but said, “My grandfather served [in the military]. And this is a country that I love. So, me not standing for the national anthem isn’t really going to get me the results that I want.”

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The expulsion of the Cherokees from Georgia is one of the most infamous acts against Native Americans in American history. Many
makkiz [27]

Answer:

Trail of tears

Explanation:

The Indian Removal Act of 1830, proposed by President Andrew Jackson, ordered the relocation of the Native Indians to the west of the Mississippi River. Cherokee Indian Tribes targeted by the act. The reason for the relocation was the establishing of white settlement in their ancestor land. During 1838 and 1839, American Indians forced to march towards the west, which became known as the Trail of Tears. According to historians, 4,000-5,000 Cherokees died in the trail.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who was president during America’s longest peacetime economic expansion but was impeached by House of Representatives?
    5·2 answers
  • Who led the United States Marines to capture John Brown? A) Stephen Douglas B) Robert E. Lee C) William Lloyd Garrison D) John B
    15·2 answers
  • What idea about government did the founding fathers include in the reamble to the constitution?
    5·1 answer
  • Which statements apply to the Old Kingdom?
    12·2 answers
  • Where does Acts 5, 8, and 9 take place?<br> And no dumb answers like "in the bible duh"
    10·1 answer
  • What can eyewitness testimonies tell us about the Holocaust that textbooks cannot?
    6·1 answer
  • Answer the following question in at least a paragraph:
    13·2 answers
  • Answer Asap Please!
    8·1 answer
  • What are some symptoms in the early and late stages of the Black Plague
    13·2 answers
  • Which key ideas and details from the graphic organizer best illustrate Madison’s perspective?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!