8m - 5n + 2m + 6n =Simplifying
8m + -5n + 2m + 6n = 0
Reorder the terms:
8m + 2m + -5n + 6n = 0
Combine like terms: 8m + 2m = 10m
10m + -5n + 6n = 0
Combine like terms: -5n + 6n = 1n
10m + 1n = 0
Solving
10m + 1n = 0
Solving for variable 'm'.
Move all terms containing m to the left, all other terms to the right.
Add '-1n' to each side of the equation.
10m + 1n + -1n = 0 + -1n
Combine like terms: 1n + -1n = 0
10m + 0 = 0 + -1n
10m = 0 + -1n
Remove the zero:
10m = -1n
Divide each side by '10'.
m = -0.1n
Simplifying
m = -0.1n.
I think the answer is 3 only if your simplify the expression
Answer:
The null hypothesis is given as
while the alternate hypothesis is 
Step-by-step explanation:
As per the the given data
p1=Proportion of Homeowners who would buy the security system
p2=Proportion of Renters who would buy the security system
As the null hypothesis states that there is no difference in the test thus it is given as

This states that there is no difference between the probabilities of the homeowners buying the security system and the renters buying the security system.
The Alternative hypothesis is the other possibility of the null hypothesis. i.e It negates the null Hypothesis and is given as

Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
There was actually too much work for this on my paper so I can't really show it, but if you can memorize this parent function I would.