I think the answer is most likely be J.
The first (F) one the population of the predator increases hugely while the population of the prey was neutral. And so both population didn’t seem to have any connection. Same goes for H. Graph G doesn’t make sense at all the population of the prey didn’t exist throughout the time in the graph but only exist in one single point of time and then just vanish again so that shouldn’t be the answer either.
In graph J, you can see the correlation between the two populations as the predator goes up and so does the prey.
You can search up on google predator-prey relationship graph to get better understanding.
Chimpanzees are more closely related while orangutans are the least closely related of the apes. Gorillas are in the middle of the two.
Answer:
<em>The correct option is A) The cell theory is the result of explanations of scientists' observations and not a description of the cell structure as it relates to the function.</em>
Explanation:
The cell theory can never become a law because Scientific theories are well-tested explanations, while laws are well-tested descriptions of natural phenomena; one cannot become the other.
A scientific theory is subjected to be changed overtime but a law cannot change. We have observed many changes in the cell theory in the past and we might find changes in this theory in the future also. Hence, the cell theory can never become a law.
The correct answer is A.
I hope I've helped!
