Answer:
So that there would be more food to go around on the home front
So that soldiers, marines, and sailors would have enough
Explanation:
got it right
Pretty much, the Communists were much stronger than the Nationalists. Their public support was strong due to promised land reform for peasants and their military organization was more experienced. The Nationalists had weak, public support and their military was ineffective, corrupt leadership and poor morale. They were an easy beat.
Hope this helps :)
<span>This English victory allowed England to gain control of the North Atlantic sea-lanes, which showed England’s naval dominance. It also inspired nationalism, which motivated the people to create more colonies in the New World. This gave England more confidence and helped with expansion.</span>
Answer:
Yes, the statement is true in the current context.
Explanation:
Pakistan stands to support Kashmiri militants like in the case of Burhan Wani killing by Indian soldiers. The killing of Burhan Wani raged violent protests which have claimed a high death toll in the valley. Pakistan's reaction came in support of the militant leader when the Prime Minister of Pakistan, Mr. Nawaz Sharif called him a martyr, and therefore his death was used to provoke anti-Indian sentiments.
Answer:
the racial policy of Nazi Germany was a set of policies and laws implemented in Nazi Germany (1933–45) based on a specific racist doctrine asserting the superiority of the Aryan race, which claimed scientific legitimacy. This was combined with a eugenics programme that aimed for racial hygiene by compulsory sterilization and extermination of those who they saw as Untermenschen ("sub-humans"), which culminated in the Holocaust.
Explanation:
