Answer:
1. Which Statement is true:
B. low p/e ratio could mean that the company has a great deal of uncertainty in its future earnings.
2. Qualitative analysis:
According to your understanding, a company with less competition is considered to be (more or less) risky than companies with a wide multiple competitors.
Explanation:
Company A's Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio is calculated as the market price of its shares divided by the earnings per share. It shows the value investors have over a stock. With a high P/E ratio, the company's stock could be over-valued, or investors are expecting high growth rates in the future. This is unlike a low P/E ratio that shows that the stock is undervalued or that investors are not expecting high growth rates in the future because of uncertainty.
Without competition, Company A is riskier than Company B which operates efficiently and competitively. There is that competitive edge that competitive companies possess. Monopolies do not enjoy that advantage. It is, therefore, riskier to have no competition.
Answer:
a. 1
Explanation:
Rules-based monetary policy advocats would most likely set the annual money supply growth rate at 1%. The money supply refers to the total value of money that is available in an economy at a particular point in time. This usually includes currency in circulation as well as demand deposits. However, the exact definition of "money supply" can vary depending on the central bank that manages it.
Answer:Churning
Explanation: My teacher told us in class
Answer:
environmental racism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this scenario could possibly be classified as environmental racism. This is a concept which describes the environmental discrimination that occurs in many geographical locations both in practice as well as on paper. All of which is based on a racialized context.
