1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kodGreya [7K]
4 years ago
13

The demand for salt is inelastic, and the supply of salt is elastic. The demand for caviar is elastic, and the supply of caviar

is inelastic. Suppose that a tax of $1 per pound is levied on the sellers of salt, and a tax of $1 per pound is levied on the buyers of caviar. We would expect that most of the burden of these taxes will fall on .
a. buyers of salt and the buyers of caviar.
b. buyers of salt and the sellers of caviar.
c. sellers of salt and the sellers of caviar.
d. sellers of salt and the buyers of caviar.
Business
1 answer:
stellarik [79]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

<h2>In the case of the salt,the salt buyers would bear most of the tax burden and for caviar,the sellers would bear most of the tax burden.Hence,the correct answer is option b. or buyers of salt and the sellers of caviar.</h2><h2 />

Explanation:

In the case of salt,the supply is more elastic than the demand which implies that the salt sellers are relatively more responsive to salt price change in the market.Therefore,if any tax is imposed on them,it would basically translate into higher production cost for the sellers and due to price elasticity of supply,the sellers would pass the tax to the salt consumers who are comparatively less price sensitive.Now,since the consumer demand for salt is inelastic and the consumers are relatively price insensitive,the consumers won't perhaps mind paying a higher market price for salt including the extra tax.Hence,in this instance,the tax burden would fall on the salt buyers or consumers.

On the other hand,based on the same line of argument,the tax burden would fall on the sellers of caviars as the price elasticity of caviar supply is less than that of the caviar demand.In this case,the caviar sellers are less sensitive about changes in market price of caviars and thus,won't mind paying a relatively higher production cost/expense which is inclusive of the tax burden.Due to higher price elasticity of demand or price responsiveness,the cavier consumers would be reluctant to bear the tax burden and pass it onto the sellers.

You might be interested in
For each scenario, calculate the cross-price elasticity between the two goods and identify how the goods are related. Please use
Leto [7]

Answer:

a. Cross-price elasticity between A and B: 0. Relationship between A and B: No relationship.

b. Cross-price elasticity between C and D: 2.22. Relationship between C and D: Substitute.

c. Cross-price elasticity between E and F: -8.50. relationship between E and F: Complimentary.

Explanation:

a. Cross-price elasticity between A and B: relationship between A and B:

Percentage change in price of A = 20%

Percentage change in quantity of B =  0%

Cross-price elasticity between A and B = 0%/ 20% = 0.00

Relationship between A and B = No relationship

Note: There is no relationship between A and B because the cross-price elasticity between A and B is zero. That is, change in the price of A does not have any effect on the quantity demanded of B.

b. Cross-price elasticity between C and D: relationship between C and D:

Percentage change in price of C = {($4 - $3) / [($4 + $3) / 2]} * 100 = 28.5714285714286%

Percentage change in quantity of D = {(85 - 44) / [(85 + 44) / 2]} * 100 = 63.5658914728682%

Cross-price elasticity between C and D = 63.5658914728682% / 28.5714285714286% = 2.22

Relationship between C and D = Substitute

Note: The relationship between C and D is substitute because the cross-price elasticity between C and D is positive. That is, an increase in the price of C makes consumer to switch to and buy more of D which is a substitute.

c. cross-price elasticity between E and F: relationship between E and F:

Percentage change in price of E = - 2%

Percentage change in quantity of F =  17%

Cross-price elasticity between E and F = 17%/ (-2%) = - 8.50

Relationship between E and F = Complimentary.

Note: The relationship between E and F is complimentary because the cross-price elasticity between E and F is negative. That is, an increase in the price of E makes consumer to buy more less F which is a compliment or use together with E.

7 0
3 years ago
Cities are municipal corporations that operate under _______ from the state.
Soloha48 [4]
Cities are municipal corporations that operate under C. Charters from the state.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Talks-A-Lot, Inc. sells cell phones to customers and expects that 10% of phones sold will be returned for repair under its warra
Gnom [1K]

Answer:

Product warrant liability to be reported as on 31.12.2021* is $3.124

<em>*The procedures are attached in a microsof excel document. </em>

Explanation:

This amount will be recognized as a liability only if product warranty amount can be rmeasured reliabily and there is probability that there will be an outflow of funds.

Download xlsx
6 0
3 years ago
A firm is using experience curve pricing when it prices high worldwide in an attempt to position itself as a market leader.
Sedbober [7]

the answer is this true

4 0
3 years ago
Firms that can employ and establish _________________, are more likely to protect their competitive advantage from being copied
pishuonlain [190]

Firms that can employ and establish <u>isolating mechanisms</u> are more likely to protect their competitive advantage from being copied and/or eroding away.

Isolation mechanisms:

A company is able to maintain its competitive edge for a longer period of time if it can stop a rival from copying the resource or capability that provides it that advantage. Isolation mechanisms is the name of this technique. For instance, a patent is a legitimate tool to stop imitation.

A firm's objective is to have a prolonged competitive advantage when a resource or capability gives the firm an advantage over competitors for an extended period of time. The industry will determine how long a company can preserve a competitive advantage.

If a business can maintain a competitive edge for a year in a fast-moving field like information technology or quick fashion, it may be quite happy. In an industry with less frequent changes, such as feminine hygiene, a persistent competitive advantage may remain considerably longer.

A sustainable competitive edge cannot be maintained by any company indefinitely. The competition is constantly working to improve its own competitive edge.

Learn more about Isolation mechanisms here:

brainly.com/question/15095207

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A project has cash flows of -$152,000, $60,800, $62,300, and $65,000 for years 0 to 3, respectively. The required rate of return
    5·1 answer
  • Lucinda buys a new gps system for​ $250. she receives consumer surplus of​ $75 from the purchase. what value does lucinda place
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these is not a critical point about an employer's decision-making process?
    8·1 answer
  • You have purchased 1 million shares in a restaurant chain venture. At this zero-stage investment, your company's assets are $100
    14·1 answer
  • What helps make a poster look attractive, improve readability, and highlight the message the designer wants to convey in the pos
    14·2 answers
  • Combination Fraction of Portfolio in Diversified Stocks Average Annual Return Standard Deviation of Portfolio Return (Risk)
    13·1 answer
  • Saira's Maid Service began the year with total assets of $120,000 and stockholders' equity of $40,000. During the year the compa
    14·1 answer
  • Free pts <br>have a nice day​
    8·2 answers
  • Government involvement in a modern economy is generally defended because:.
    7·1 answer
  • The first person that answers ill give u 50 brainlist points, brainlist to, stars, and a heart
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!