Answer:
I think the answer is C People ,it could also be D
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe it's the first one forgive me if I'm wrong tho:/
Answer:
Paraphrase of an experts research, A summary of someone elses ideas, Your old project you used last year, A summary of someone else's ideas
Explanation:
Since plagiarism means to copy somones work you would want to pick the answers that avoid copying someones elses work. You could do Your old project you used last year because you wrote it but only if it alines with the topic.
Answer: Because Sweet Nothings is an expository piece of writing.
Explanation:
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings presents evidence to support weight loss and refute weight loss because her writing is an expository piece of writing.
An expository piece of writing just as the name implies is one that exposes readers to a particular idea or topic. It’s purpose is to inform about and describe a particular subject or idea.
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings may have been expected to stick to a particular side of the subject, that is either present evidence that supports weight loss or the one that refutes weight loss.
Instead, she presented both because her writing is an expository piece informing her readers about the both the advantages and disadvantages of weight loss.
Louis' win over Schmeling didn't end racial segregation in America, but it helped pave the way for future generations of civil rights activists. The victory made it easier for Jackie Robinson to break Major League Baseball's color barrier. "If there had not been a Joe Louis
