The Cold War became a dominant influence on many aspects of American society for much of the second half of the 20th<span> century. It escalated due to antagonist values between the United States, representing capitalism and democracy, and the Soviet Union, representing communism and authoritarianism. Being the two dominant world powers after WWII, contention between the Americans and Soviets became a global conflict. The Cold War differed from most wars in that it was as much of a propaganda war as a war with military engagements. The Korean and Vietnam Wars are important examples of military intervention by the Americans in the name of stopping communist expansionism. However, these wars did not have the decades-long impact on American domestic and foreign policy that the cultural, political, and economic battles of the Cold War had.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the previous link was not attached, we can say the following.
The central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source are the following,
A primary resource comes from the people who witnessed the event, the incident, or the specific moment. These people could have written their own descriptions, testimonies, books, or maybe journalists that directly reported what happened. It also could be an interview with people who were part of the historical event. For instance, if it is a soldier that participated in the Vietnam War, a journalist can interview him and use it as a primary source.
On the other hand, secondary sources can be obtained from other sources that were not direct. This could be an author that based its story in other investigations, or it could be encyclopedias.
British tried to rise the taxes, so the Americans did not like it and staring to planning the American Revolution.
The Franco-Indigenous War only came to an end in 1763, when the Treaty of Paris was signed. It regulated the end of maritime and colonial disputes, but left behind the loss of almost all French possessions in North America, the recognition of all British achievements, and the possession of a small territory in Louisiana for the Spaniards.
In a unanimous decision, the Court held that Congress had the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers. Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Marshall noted that Congress possessed unenumerated powers not explicitly outlined in the Constitution. Marshall also held that while the states retained the power of taxation, "the Constitution and the laws made in pursuance thereof are supreme. . .they control the Constitution and laws of the respective states, and cannot be controlled by them."
