1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sweet-ann [11.9K]
3 years ago
9

Which of these Speakers is most likely a Protestant Reformer speaking

History
1 answer:
Neko [114]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Correct answer is B: Through faith alone will you be saved from eternal punishments. All humans  being thus equal should take their prayers to God in person

Explanation:

B is correct answer because Protestant Reformers didn't believe in indulgence and were preaching that salvation will come to those who are believing in God, and that they don't need a mediator in that process. They were objecting the influence of the church.

A is obviously some English Protestant speaking against Philip of Spain, who waged war against England.

C is also someone who is supporting Protestantism, but is not directly speaking against the church.

D also isn't someone speaking against the church, as it can be someone describing the events in Europe in 16th or 17th Century.

You might be interested in
ILL GIVE 25 POINTS PLZ HELP<br> Identify the consequences to leaving women out of history.
son4ous [18]

ERROR                                                  .....................

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statements describe an event or belief that led to the Crusades?
Anettt [7]
Christians wanted to regain control of the Holy Land from Muslims.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the 1770s, fewer farmers were needed in Britain because of machines and new techniques, so out-of-work farmers
sattari [20]
They usually had all of the crops and things like that imported from America.
6 0
2 years ago
Should national borders be based on ethnicity and national identity? why?
Lady bird [3.3K]

In general yes, but that can not always be the case.

Explanation:

The countries around the world have borders of numerous types. While some have been roughly determined on ethnic base or on national identity, some are not. Unfortunately, very often different groups of people from different ethnic or religious groups have tensions between them when put in the same borders, leading to violence, conflicts, and even genocides.

The primary argument as to why the countries should have borders set in accordance to the ethnicity is that it will contribute to elimination of internal problems, and the different groups of people will not be allowed to engage into conflict with each other. While this is a possibility for some countries, like Finland, Mongolia, Italy, for some like the US, China, or Russia it is not really a possibility. The reason for that is that the US for example is a country made up of people of all sorts of ethnic backgrounds. China has numerous regions where there are other groups of people, but in all of them it is Han Chinese that are majority. In Russia, most of the autonomous regions that have majority of other people groups will not be able to survive on their own.

Learn more about autonomous regions brainly.com/question/4889912

#learnwithBrainly

4 0
3 years ago
Identify the propaganda tactics used by american plan supporters to undermine the labor movement.
Tasya [4]

Answer:

Explanation:Before we start talking about federalism, take a moment and see if you can count the number of government entities that have jurisdiction over the place you are right now.

What did you come up with? One? Three? More than that?

Your answer might differ quite a bit depending on where you are. You might be obligated to abide by the laws of your country, your state, your province, your district, your county, your city, or your town. In some countries, a citizen might be governed by three or more layers of government. In others, they might only be governed by a single national government.

In the United States, the two major layers of government are at the state and national levels. This system, where more than one layer of government has jurisdiction over the same territory, is called federalism. Although it seems natural to US citizens that government is divided into multiple layers, in fact, there are only 15 federal republics in the world.

In the United States, the federalist system emerged because the states evolved from separate colonies, which had diverse populations and different needs. The Framers of the Constitution envisioned that state governments, not the national government, would be the main unit of government for citizens on a day-to-day basis.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which democratic principle of the constitution allows people to create change or alter government
    13·2 answers
  • How did peace with the French hasten the American Revolution?
    6·1 answer
  • The programs of the New Deal offered some relief but the ______ was too low for recipients to live on comfortably.
    9·1 answer
  • Who controlled much of the spice trade during the early 1400s?
    6·2 answers
  • Which accurately describes events of the Haitian Slave Revolt on the island of Hispaniola (formerly Saint-Domingue)?
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone help me? I already tried looking it up, but couldn’t find anything.
    11·1 answer
  • Which country created the first the republic government?
    9·2 answers
  • The Renaissance radically changed the way of life for millions of Europeans. Which change did you find the most significant?
    8·1 answer
  • How well did Kennedy use flexible response to deal with the Berlin Wall crisis
    11·1 answer
  • Can anyone give me a summary on Lucretius please
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!