1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mekhanik [1.2K]
3 years ago
15

This was the name given to the most senior member of the majority party in a parliamentary system

History
1 answer:
Natali5045456 [20]3 years ago
4 0
The answer is prime minister.
You might be interested in
Why did Europeans justify their reasons even though they knew it was bad for the Native Americans? Explain in 5 sentences (1 par
zlopas [31]

Answer: The Europeans used this tactic so they can get their way. The different countries needed to grow a strong and mighty empires. Columbus committed genocide and mass murder to get the land the Native Americans had in the Caribbean. These were ways Europeans used as great ways to grow their empires. They had to justify their reasons for this cause.

Hope this answer helps you!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write the Declaration of Independence in your own words
ioda

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance. I can't put the whole thing i have to keep it under 5000 charaters.

7 0
3 years ago
1. Which of the following pieces of legislation was also known as the Wagner Act? A)the National Recovery Act
dsp73

1- The correct answer is C. The National Labor Relations Act was also known as the Wagner Act.

The National Labor Relations Act, also called the Wagner Act, was a federal law of the United States issued in July 1935 to limit the reactions of employers against workers who formed unions, collectively offered their services, joined strikes, or performed similar acts of defense of their rights in concerted form, whether forming a union or without it.

This act was not applicable to workers subject to special regimes: railway workers, agricultural workers, domestic workers, independent contractors, or workers of the federal or state government, these had their own rules.

2- The correct answer is D. The New Deal had some impact on bringing about an end to the Great Depression.

New Deal was the name given by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to his interventionist policy put in place to fight against the effects of the Great Depression in the United States. This program was developed between 1933 and 1938 with the objective of supporting the poorest layers of the population, reforming financial markets and revitalizing a wounded American economy since the crash of 1929 due to unemployment and bankruptcies.

The fight against the crisis lasted until the United States mobilized its economy with the Second World War. The success of the New Deal is undeniable on the social level. The policy carried out by President Franklin D. Roosevelt changed the country through reforms and not through a revolution. On the other hand, the programs of the New Deal were openly experimental, manifestly perfectible, and given the costs of this process, there could be preferred a more complete change program. However, the imperfect nature of the New Deal allowed a constructive criticism and a more deliberate reflection that opened the way to an improvement of American democracy in the following years and which lasts until today.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Lines 239–254: Cite evidence to explain the opposing view and counterargument that King presents in these lines.
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

These evidences are gotten from his personal experiences, direct quotations, and examples.

Explanation:

King believed that the Vietnam War was diverting money and the attention from domestic programs which were created to help the black poor.

King's counter argument was:

"People will say that I am just a civil rights leader and have no business taking sides on the issue of war."

His argument was:

"The issue of America's soul is my concern whether it be about civil rights or war".

He said, ‘the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at home…We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem.'”

4 0
3 years ago
Why did the Cold War start in Europe and how did it involve and impact developing and newly independent nations
S_A_V [24]
The Cold War threatened the independence of new nations. Since the Soviet Union and the United States were competing for political influence, many newly independent nations were subject to take over either by the Soviet Union or the USA. However, there was also a positive impact to some newly independent countries because the two antagonists of the Cold War would support whatever country they saw fit. Therefore, some new countries gained support from larger nations.

This is just one of the many possible answers, since so many nations were affected differently. All the same, I hope this helps. :)
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • True False/ Peasants represented 70% of the French population in the late 1700's.
    12·1 answer
  • Which painting by Leonardo da Vinci of an unknown woman with a mysterious smile and a misty landscape behind her is one of the b
    9·2 answers
  • What was the Chinese and Soviet agreement called
    11·1 answer
  • Imagine you are Sancho Panza. Write a postcard about your adventures with Don Quixote. Just from reading this excerpt, what coul
    13·2 answers
  • The silk road facilitated _____​
    14·1 answer
  • Người đã biên soạn bộ sách bách khoa song ngữ về aztec là ai
    7·1 answer
  • In the years following the Civil War, leaders of some American businesses attempted to bribe Treasury Department officials in
    8·1 answer
  • What was the name of the theory that said that if one country in a region fell to Communism, others would surely follow? domino
    5·2 answers
  • When the Civil War broke out in the United States, most countries in Europe and Latin America?
    13·2 answers
  • Summarize the German reaction to the treaty of Versailles
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!