McCarthyism is nothing more than a witch hunt. A lot of finger pointing and not a lot of proof. Both parties (Democrat & Republican) in the United States use this in todays world. Ill give examples of both and follow up with how it can be beneficial to each party.
Democrats: Accuse other politicians of being "racist" or "bigoted" just from political ideas and from certain members of the base. While it is not fact or true that Republicans are by policy racist, it is a word that is hated by people and has a negative connotation to it, forcing some to keep distance from said person
Republicans: Accuse other politicians of being "muslin lovers" or "muslins" themselves. We saw this for the entire Obama presidency. Congress and some Republican supporters would use the word "muslin" to describe the president in order to give a negative connotation towards Obama. This has some strong effectiveness due to the recent events (September 11th, 2001).
Both parties are trying to stick a negative idea/precedent/description about the opposition in order to sway votes. This tactic is very effective because not only will you sway votes, theres little repercussion in doing so because the people who disagree with you are not going to be swayed, but that voter in the middle who cares about one issue over the other (in this case racism over fear of muslims or vice versa fear of muslims over racism).
Either someone is intelligent enough to know the rhetoric between the two parties and votes by policy (unaffected / no positive or negative response), they don't care about either issue (unaffected / no positive or negative response), or someone is strongly in favor of one or the other (strong positive or negative response).
While there are some attempts that have been made and can be made that would be so egregious that most people have a negative response, but that rarely happens and would be deemed political suicide.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
I think that the answer is a because she wouldn't have been able to see adrian sneaking into school between 3:00p.m.-7:00p.m. because he left wrok for about an hour and thirty minutes 1:10-2:40 and then returned to his job and stayed there.
Hope this helps.
If i am wrong I am sorry
Have a nice day/night
The answer is D. It is restarting the thesis.
Answer:
inside story
Explanation:
The action of a play is generally confined to a "world" of its own—that is, to a fictional universe that contains all the characters and events of the play—and none of the characters or actions moves outside the orbit of that world.
Thirty-five of the Pilgrims were members of the extreme English Separatist Church, who came to America to escape the jurisdiction of the corrupt Church of England.
Ten years before, a group of Separatists fled to Holland in quest of religious freedom due to English persecution.
<h3>Why did the Pilgrims choose to leave Holland? What hardships did they face before deciding to travel to America?</h3>
The Pilgrims spent several years in Holland before setting foot in North America.
The group, led by William Brewster and John Robinson, went to Amsterdam in 1608 to avoid religious persecution for performing clandestine services not sanctioned by the Church of England.
<h3>What freedoms were the Puritans pursuing?</h3>
Theirs was a theocracy that ruled over every element of their life. Religion and freedom of speech or the press were as strange to the Puritans as they were to the Church of England.
When other colonies arrived with other views, the Puritans drove them away.
Learn more about the Pilgrims:
brainly.com/question/2757594
#SPJ1
