Answer:
d. he made sure that it was more democratic than Massachusetts Bay.
Explanation:
Roger Williams was the founder of the Puritan settlement of Rhode Island. This was an outcome of his attempt to make bring about a separation between the church and the state in asserting their powers.
Banished from the Massachusetts's Bay Colony due to his opposition about the government's confiscation of Indian lands from the people, he caused the church to condemn him which led to his banishment. Finding it hard to live where there is less religious freedom and tolerance, he moved to Rhode Island and founded the state of Rhode Island. This place became a haven for all believers, including Jews, making sure that there is a more democratic form of authority. He made it mandatory that there is a definite separation of the church and the state, which later became the basis of the Constitution of the United States.
The factors would probably being women who gave birth and women who took care of the house hold
Expand - both sides wanted the valley so they could expand their settlements into the area
Mississippi - Great Britain secured territorial gains in French territory east of the Mississippi river
Canada - all the lands to the south of French Canada was claimed by England
South - the English gradually settled all along the Atlantic seaboard to the south of the Gulf of Saint Lawrence
Answer:
A) Power struggles are those that are visible and in which two or more individuals and groups compete to achieve a goal they want.
Explanation:
The one-dimensional view of power is one of the "three dimensions" of Steven Lukes' concept of power. He describes a one-dimensional view of power as the individuals' behavioral attribute(power) includes influencing and modifying the behavior of other individuals and thus, involves the decisions that are based on“observable direct conflicts”. Thus, according to the question, the option that displays this view is exemplified through the <em>option A as it relates to the power struggles that involve the 'observable conflict/interests' where the individuals or group compete in order to attain a goal.</em>
Answer: Argumentum Ad hominem
Explanation: Argumentum ad hominem could be called different names such as character assassination or mudslinging which refers to actions of deviation from from the main discussion to issues regarding the character of the person. Ad hominem is generally applied to fallacious argumentative strategy which is poised on attacking the emotion, attitude and behavior of the person making the argument rather than addressing the current issue or topic being addressed or discussed. It is associated with making prejudicial judgement based on the attitude, character and emotion of the individual making the argument and deviating from the original or present issue at hand.
