Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.
In the given situation, the systems property illustrated is called equifinality. The case says that there three people were fired at ABC Corporation. Eugene was fired because he was incompetent. Rita was fired because she was unethical. Kayla was fired because of economic conditions. Equifinality in business implies that firms may establish similar competitive advantages based on substantially different competencies. The concept is that there are many paths to the same end. The idea states that there are multiple ways to reach a final goal. In open systems, equifinality states that in open systems a given end state can be reached by many potential means.
Answer:
10.38%
Explanation:
The formula to compute the effective annual rate of the loan is shown below:
= (1 + nominal interest rate ÷ periods)^ number of period - 1
The nominal interest rate is shown below:
= $250 × 4 ÷ $10,000
= $1,000 ÷ $10,000
= 0.1
Now the effective annual rate is
= (1 + 0.1 ÷ 4)^4 - 1
= (1 + 0.025)^4 - 1
= 1.025^4 - 1
= 10.38%
Since the interest rate is measured on a quarterly basis, we know there are four quarters in a year and we do the same in the calculation part.
This is the answer but the same is not provided in the given options
Answer:
normative control
Explanation:
Normative control refers to using the values that the employees share as standards instead of using policies to influence the desired behaviors. According to this, the answer is that this is an example of normative control because Gary employs people that share certain values and behaviors and these become the standard to perform their jobs.
Based on the fact that Wreckorp wants to maintain an exclusivity image and limits its distribution to 100 stores in each region, it is Impossible to determine legality based on the information provided.
<h3>Are Wreckorp's actions legal?</h3>
It is not possible to know if Wreckorp's actions are legal or illegal because the information provided does not give the full facts.
The actions of Wreckorp may be legal if no region is being disadvantaged but it could be illegal if this is the case. More information is therefore needed.
Options for this question are:
- Strictly illegal
- Impossible to determine legality based on the information provided
- Strictly Legal
Find out more on the legality of business actions at brainly.com/question/4556120.
#SPJ1